Data Shapes Working Group - Activity in 2024
No matches.
Lifecycle
-
1 charter started.
-
Chartered until 31 December 2026. Participants had to rejoin under this charter.
-
Participants
-
2 chairs appointed.
-
Eliana Papoutsoglou became a chair.
-
Nicholas Car became a chair.
-
-
1 Team contact appointed.
-
Carine Bournez became a Team contact.
-
-
9 participants joined.
-
Ted Thibodeau Jr (OpenLink Software Inc.) joined.
-
Jesse Wright (University of Oxford) joined.
-
Eliana Papoutsoglou (Y.digital) joined.
-
Simon Steyskal (Siemens AG) joined.
-
Rémi Ceres (Inria) joined.
-
Nicholas Car (KurrawongAI) joined.
-
Tomasz Pluskiewicz (Zazuko GmbH) joined.
-
Andy Seaborne (Apache Software Foundation) joined.
-
Carine Bournez (W3C) joined.
-
-
5 organizations joined.
-
OpenLink Software Inc. joined.
-
University of Oxford joined.
-
Apache Software Foundation joined.
-
KurrawongAI joined.
-
Zazuko GmbH joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
5 issues opened.
-
migrate w3c/shacl to this repo w3c/data-shapes#162, by @dontcallmedom.
-
Incorrect Data Type for `sh:namespace` in SHACL Declaration w3c/data-shapes#208, by @Zakaria29041996.
-
ability to limit the number of sh:ValidationResults w3c/data-shapes#161, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
Multivalued or union sh:dataType w3c/data-shapes#160, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
SHACL SPARQL cannot use `VALUES`? w3c/data-shapes#159, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
-
7 issues received 8 new comments.
-
ability to limit the number of sh:ValidationResults w3c/data-shapes#161 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)
-
allow interpolating vars in `message` for all constraints w3c/data-shapes#204 (1 comment by @VladimirAlexiev)
-
Improve validation involving XSD integer datatypes w3c/data-shapes#142 (1 comment by @VladimirAlexiev)
-
Opening the URI of a SHACL class/property in the browser should lead to the appropriate part in the specification w3c/data-shapes#206 (1 comment by @VladimirAlexiev)
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
2 issues opened.
-
`sh:icon` property w3c/data-shapes#207, by @jeswr.
-
-
1 issue received 2 new comments.
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
1 issue opened.
-
SHACL Test ontology unavailable w3c/data-shapes#205, by @MaillPierre.
-
-
2 issues received 3 new comments.
-
Support `sh:message`, `sh:severity`, and `sh:deactivated` per constraint triple w3c/data-shapes#173 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
1 issue opened.
-
allow interpolating vars in `message` for all constraints w3c/data-shapes#204, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
-
6 issues received 17 new comments.
-
Property Shapes without paths w3c/data-shapes#202 (6 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @matthiaspalmer, @tpluscode, @VladimirAlexiev)
-
conformance testing of modern SHACL implementations w3c/data-shapes#203 (5 comments by @afs, @gkellogg, @tpluscode, @VladimirAlexiev)
-
allow interpolating vars in `message` for all constraints w3c/data-shapes#204 (2 comments by @bertvannuffelen, @HolgerKnublauch)
-
use case: local parameterised messages w3c/data-shapes#158 (2 comments by @bertvannuffelen, @VladimirAlexiev)
-
Support `sh:message`, `sh:severity`, and `sh:deactivated` per constraint triple w3c/data-shapes#173 (1 comment by @bertvannuffelen)
-
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
6 issues opened.
-
conformance testing of modern SHACL implementations w3c/data-shapes#203, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
Property Shapes without paths w3c/data-shapes#202, by @tpluscode.
-
consider embedding SPARQL syntax in SHACL-C w3c/data-shapes#201, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
consider Extra SHACL features w3c/data-shapes#199, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
use "SHACL-C" or "SHACLC"? w3c/data-shapes#198, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
SHACL-C: analyze EBNF grammar complexity w3c/data-shapes#200, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
-
6 issues received 13 new comments.
-
Make `sh:prefixes` optional in SHACL-SPARQL queries w3c/data-shapes#176 (6 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @TallTed, @VladimirAlexiev)
-
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
2 issues opened.
-
Missing Type for `shsh:` w3c/data-shapes#196, by @hoijui.
-
Make `sh:prefixes` optional in SHACL-SPARQL queries w3c/data-shapes#176, by @HolgerKnublauch.
-
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
1 issue opened.
-
Support for the {n,m} form for property paths w3c/data-shapes#195, by @jerdebsp.
-
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
4 issues opened.
-
use case: local parameterised messages w3c/data-shapes#158, by @bertvannuffelen.
-
Which github repo to use? w3c/data-shapes#157, by @bertvannuffelen.
-
mandatory sh:path in PropertyShape w3c/data-shapes#156, by @bertvannuffelen.
-
shaclc: handle grammars copyright w3c/data-shapes#197, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
-
3 issues received 5 new comments.
-
use case: local parameterised messages w3c/data-shapes#158 (3 comments by @bertvannuffelen, @HolgerKnublauch)
-
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
2 issues opened.
-
SHACLC: tighten grammar re nodeValue, propertyValue w3c/data-shapes#194, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
SHACLC LSP implementation w3c/data-shapes#193, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
-
4 issues received 21 new comments.
-
Select SHACL Compact Syntax editors w3c/data-shapes#187 (16 comments by @afs, @HolgerKnublauch, @jeswr, @mielvds, @tw-osthus, @VladimirAlexiev)
-
Extending SHACL-C to enable the expression of any RDF statements w3c/data-shapes#186 (2 comments by @jeswr, @VladimirAlexiev)
-
Where should my ontology go? Data graph versus shapes graph w3c/data-shapes#185 (1 comment by @wouterbeek)
-
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
16 issues opened.
-
Add something similar to `dash:singleLine` w3c/data-shapes#177, by @HolgerKnublauch.
-
Add something similar to `dash:hasValueWithClass` w3c/data-shapes#178, by @HolgerKnublauch.
-
Add something similar to `dash:closedByTypes` w3c/data-shapes#172, by @HolgerKnublauch.
-
Add severity levels that are not violations w3c/data-shapes#192, by @bergos.
-
Logical Constraint Components with multiple SHACL lists are underspecified w3c/data-shapes#191, by @bergos.
-
Update the Test Suite w3c/data-shapes#190, by @bergos.
-
Enable "Shapes as Data" Paradigm w3c/data-shapes#189, by @mgberg.
-
Add a Constraint Component for uniqueness among values reached by a SHACL Path w3c/data-shapes#188, by @mgberg.
-
Select SHACL Compact Syntax editors w3c/data-shapes#187, by @HolgerKnublauch.
-
Extending SHACL-C to enable the expression of any RDF statements w3c/data-shapes#186, by @jeswr.
-
Where should my ontology go? Data graph versus shapes graph w3c/data-shapes#185, by @wouterbeek.
-
Select SHACL SPARQL editors w3c/data-shapes#174, by @HolgerKnublauch.
-
Select SHACL Core editors w3c/data-shapes#175, by @HolgerKnublauch.
-
Support `sh:message`, `sh:severity`, and `sh:deactivated` per constraint triple w3c/data-shapes#173, by @HolgerKnublauch.
-
Where should my ontology go? Data graph versus shapes graph w3c/data-shapes#155, by @wouterbeek.
-
Support for RDF 1.2 initial text direction w3c/data-shapes#184, by @afs.
-
-
4 issues closed.
-
Where should my ontology go? Data graph versus shapes graph w3c/data-shapes#155.
-
union of targets should be DISTINCT w3c/data-shapes#143.
-
sh:name on NodeShape ? w3c/data-shapes#145.
-
Standalone PropertyShape behavior w3c/data-shapes#146.
-
-
14 issues received 28 new comments.
-
Where should my ontology go? Data graph versus shapes graph w3c/data-shapes#155 (5 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @simonstey, @wouterbeek)
-
Add a Constraint Component for uniqueness among values reached by a SHACL Path w3c/data-shapes#188 (4 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @mgberg, @TallTed)
-
Add severity levels that are not violations w3c/data-shapes#192 (3 comments by @bergos, @HolgerKnublauch)
-
Where should my ontology go? Data graph versus shapes graph w3c/data-shapes#185 (3 comments by @bergos, @HolgerKnublauch)
-
Add something similar to `dash:closedByTypes` w3c/data-shapes#172 (2 comments by @bergos, @HolgerKnublauch)
-
Logical Constraint Components with multiple SHACL lists are underspecified w3c/data-shapes#191 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)
-
Extending SHACL-C to enable the expression of any RDF statements w3c/data-shapes#186 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)
-
Expressing statistics using VOID based on SHACL shapes w3c/data-shapes#154 (1 comment by @tfrancart)
-
GitHub
w3c/data-shapes
-
4 issues opened.
-
Need support for RDF datasets (i.e., graphs, quads) w3c/data-shapes#183, by @TallTed.
-
Expressing statistics using VOID based on SHACL shapes w3c/data-shapes#154, by @tfrancart.
-
Predicate to state "isTargetOfShape" (~ inverse of sh:targetNode) w3c/data-shapes#153, by @tfrancart.
-
Inconsistency regarding `sh:or` w3c/data-shapes#152, by @wouterbeek.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Clarify the domain of the logical constraint components w3c/data-shapes#138.
-
-
3 issues received 6 new comments.
-
Clarify the domain of the logical constraint components w3c/data-shapes#138 (1 comment by @wouterbeek)
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Submitting shaWell EARL validation report w3c/data-shapes#151, by @cem-okulmus.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Submitting shaWell EARL validation report w3c/data-shapes#151.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.