Data Shapes Working Group - Activity in 2017

GitHub

w3c/data-shapes

• 2 issues opened.

  • 30 October 2017

    Incorrect test suite result for `core/property/uniqueLang-002`? w3c/data-shapes#98, by @dthume.

  • 18 October 2017

    nodeValidator-ask-001 and propertyValidator-ask-001 tests need revision w3c/data-shapes#96, by @jimkont.

• 2 issues closed.

  • 31 October 2017

    Incorrect test suite result for `core/property/uniqueLang-002`? w3c/data-shapes#98.

  • 24 October 2017

    nodeValidator-ask-001 and propertyValidator-ask-001 tests need revision w3c/data-shapes#96.

• 2 issues received 7 new comments.

  • Latest comment 31 October 2017

    Incorrect test suite result for `core/property/uniqueLang-002`? w3c/data-shapes#98 (4 comments by @dthume, @HolgerKnublauch)

  • Latest comment 20 October 2017

    nodeValidator-ask-001 and propertyValidator-ask-001 tests need revision w3c/data-shapes#96 (3 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @jimkont)
• 3 pull requests opened.

  • 21 October 2017

    test updates for issue #96 w3c/data-shapes#97, by @jimkont.

  • 18 October 2017

    RDFUnit implementation report w3c/data-shapes#95, by @jimkont.

  • 7 October 2017

    RDFUnit implmentation report w3c/data-shapes#94, by @jimkont.

• 2 pull requests merged.

  • 18 October 2017

    RDFUnit implementation report w3c/data-shapes#95.

  • 9 October 2017

    RDFUnit implmentation report w3c/data-shapes#94.

• 1 pull request closed.

  • 24 October 2017

    test updates for issue #96 w3c/data-shapes#97.

• 3 pull requests received 9 new comments.

  • Latest comment 24 October 2017

    test updates for issue #96 w3c/data-shapes#97 (5 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @jimkont)

  • Latest comment 18 October 2017

    RDFUnit implementation report w3c/data-shapes#95 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @jimkont)

  • Latest comment 10 October 2017

    RDFUnit implmentation report w3c/data-shapes#94 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @jimkont)

GitHub

w3c/data-shapes

• 2 issues opened.

  • 20 September 2017

    Validate that graph contains a node with a specific type w3c/data-shapes#93, by @MiguelAraCo.

  • 13 September 2017

    Disjointness of Qualified Value Shapes w3c/data-shapes#92, by @white-gecko.

• 1 issue closed.

  • 21 September 2017

    Validate that graph contains a node with a specific type w3c/data-shapes#93.

• 3 issues received 7 new comments.

  • Latest comment 22 September 2017

    Disjointness of Qualified Value Shapes w3c/data-shapes#92 (4 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @simonstey, @white-gecko)

  • Latest comment 21 September 2017

    Validate that graph contains a node with a specific type w3c/data-shapes#93 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @MiguelAraCo)

  • 13 September 2017

    clarification on the semantics of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint w3c/data-shapes#47 (1 comment by @white-gecko)

GitHub

w3c/data-shapes

• 4 issues opened.

  • 30 August 2017

    Can sh:hasValue point to multiple values? w3c/data-shapes#91, by @MiguelAraCo.

  • 29 August 2017

    How does sh:hasValue should validate against focus nodes? w3c/data-shapes#90, by @MiguelAraCo.

  • 29 August 2017

    Which are the value nodes when a sh:PropertyShape has target declarations? w3c/data-shapes#89, by @MiguelAraCo.

  • 25 August 2017

    What happens if a focus node is a literal and the sh:Shape has sh:path? w3c/data-shapes#88, by @MiguelAraCo.

• 4 issues closed.

  • 30 August 2017

    Can sh:hasValue point to multiple values? w3c/data-shapes#91.

  • 30 August 2017

    How does sh:hasValue should validate against focus nodes? w3c/data-shapes#90.

  • 29 August 2017

    Which are the value nodes when a sh:PropertyShape has target declarations? w3c/data-shapes#89.

  • 28 August 2017

    What happens if a focus node is a literal and the sh:Shape has sh:path? w3c/data-shapes#88.

• 4 issues received 13 new comments.

  • Latest comment 29 August 2017

    Which are the value nodes when a sh:PropertyShape has target declarations? w3c/data-shapes#89 (4 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @MiguelAraCo)

  • Latest comment 28 August 2017

    What happens if a focus node is a literal and the sh:Shape has sh:path? w3c/data-shapes#88 (4 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @MiguelAraCo)

  • Latest comment 30 August 2017

    Can sh:hasValue point to multiple values? w3c/data-shapes#91 (3 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @MiguelAraCo)

  • Latest comment 30 August 2017

    How does sh:hasValue should validate against focus nodes? w3c/data-shapes#90 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @MiguelAraCo)

TR publications

• 3 documents published.

  • 20 July 2017

    Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) published as a Recommendation. History of Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)

  • 20 July 2017

    SHACL Abstract Syntax -- Note on Status of Obsolete Proposal published as a Note. History of SHACL Abstract Syntax -- Note on Status of Obsolete Proposal

  • 20 July 2017

    SHACL Use Cases and Requirements published as a Note. History of SHACL Use Cases and Requirements

GitHub

w3c/data-shapes

• 9 issues closed.

  • 18 July 2017

    problematic cases for pre-binding w3c/data-shapes#61.

  • 18 July 2017

    behaviour of SHACL Core implementations on shapes graphs with SHACL-SPARQL constructs w3c/data-shapes#63.

  • 18 July 2017

    behaviour of SHACL Core implementation on shapes graphs with ill-formed SHACL-SPARQL constructs w3c/data-shapes#65.

  • 18 July 2017

    non-redundant multiple sh:minInclusive w3c/data-shapes#68.

  • 18 July 2017

    denial of service security problems with SERVICE w3c/data-shapes#73.

  • 18 July 2017

    path syntax too liberal w3c/data-shapes#75.

  • 18 July 2017

    proposed test pre-binding-006 has wrong expected result w3c/data-shapes#84.

  • 18 July 2017

    no testing of shapesGraph and currentShape w3c/data-shapes#85.

  • 18 July 2017

    inconsistent requirements for sh:focusNode w3c/data-shapes#55.

TR publications

• 3 documents published.

  • 8 June 2017

    Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) published as a Proposed Recommendation. History of Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)

  • 8 June 2017

    SHACL Advanced Features published as a Note. History of SHACL Advanced Features

  • 8 June 2017

    SHACL JavaScript Extensions published as a Note. History of SHACL JavaScript Extensions

GitHub

w3c/data-shapes

• 2 issues opened.

  • 14 May 2017

    no testing of shapesGraph and currentShape w3c/data-shapes#85, by @pfps.

  • 12 May 2017

    proposed test pre-binding-006 has wrong expected result w3c/data-shapes#84, by @pfps.

• 9 issues received 47 new comments.

  • Latest comment 18 May 2017

    proposed test pre-binding-006 has wrong expected result w3c/data-shapes#84 (11 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 10 May 2017

    non-redundant multiple sh:minInclusive w3c/data-shapes#68 (7 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq, @pfps, @simonstey)

  • Latest comment 10 May 2017

    behaviour of SHACL Core implementations on shapes graphs with SHACL-SPARQL constructs w3c/data-shapes#63 (7 comments by @irenetq, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 10 May 2017

    problematic cases for pre-binding w3c/data-shapes#61 (6 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 10 May 2017

    path syntax too liberal w3c/data-shapes#75 (4 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 4 May 2017

    denial of service security problems with SERVICE w3c/data-shapes#73 (4 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 3 May 2017

    inconsistent requirements for sh:focusNode w3c/data-shapes#55 (4 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 10 May 2017

    behaviour of SHACL Core implementation on shapes graphs with ill-formed SHACL-SPARQL constructs w3c/data-shapes#65 (3 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq)

  • 18 May 2017

    no testing of shapesGraph and currentShape w3c/data-shapes#85 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)
• 4 pull requests opened.

  • 22 May 2017

    Rerun SHACL engine with new prebinding test 6 succesfully. Added preb… w3c/data-shapes#87, by @nicky508.

  • 18 May 2017

    Added validated test w3c/data-shapes#86, by @nicky508.

  • 4 May 2017

    Updated SHACL testsuite w3c/data-shapes#83, by @nicky508.

  • 3 May 2017

    double sh:class that produce duplicate validation result w3c/data-shapes#82, by @pfps.

• 5 pull requests merged.

  • 22 May 2017

    Rerun SHACL engine with new prebinding test 6 succesfully. Added preb… w3c/data-shapes#87.

  • 18 May 2017

    Added validated test w3c/data-shapes#86.

  • 4 May 2017

    Updated SHACL testsuite w3c/data-shapes#83.

  • 4 May 2017

    double sh:class that produce duplicate validation result w3c/data-shapes#82.

  • 2 May 2017

    two tests of strange paths w3c/data-shapes#81.

• 2 pull requests closed.

  • 3 May 2017

    fix results for class-003 w3c/data-shapes#80.

  • 2 May 2017

    tests for subselect that doesn't bind $this w3c/data-shapes#79.

• 1 pull request reopened.

  • 2 May 2017

    two tests of strange paths w3c/data-shapes#81, by @HolgerKnublauch.

• 1 pull request received 1 new comment.

  • 2 May 2017

    tests for subselect that doesn't bind $this w3c/data-shapes#79 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

TR publications

• 1 document published.

  • 11 April 2017

    Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) published as a Candidate Recommendation Snapshot. History of Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)

GitHub

w3c/data-shapes

• 16 issues opened.

  • 27 April 2017

    path syntax too liberal w3c/data-shapes#75, by @pfps.

  • 25 April 2017

    denial of service security problems with SERVICE w3c/data-shapes#73, by @pfps.

  • 21 April 2017

    non-redundant multiple sh:minInclusive w3c/data-shapes#68, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    test cases process removes too much w3c/data-shapes#67, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    behaviour of SHACL Core implementation on shapes graphs with ill-formed SHACL-SPARQL constructs w3c/data-shapes#65, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    no required checks for recursive shapes in SHACL implementations that do not handle recursion w3c/data-shapes#64, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    behaviour of SHACL Core implementations on shapes graphs with SHACL-SPARQL constructs w3c/data-shapes#63, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    important aspects of SHACL Core not covered by shacl-shacl shapes graph w3c/data-shapes#62, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    problematic cases for pre-binding w3c/data-shapes#61, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    requirements on sh:message not checked in test cases process w3c/data-shapes#60, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    optional values not handled correctly in test cases process w3c/data-shapes#59, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    non-isomorphic but equivalent paths in validation reports w3c/data-shapes#58, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    SHACL requirements in non-normative parts of the document w3c/data-shapes#57, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    status of advice in test suite document on validation reports w3c/data-shapes#56, by @pfps.

  • 20 April 2017

    inconsistent requirements for sh:focusNode w3c/data-shapes#55, by @pfps.

  • 6 April 2017

    clarification on the semantics of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint w3c/data-shapes#47, by @iovka.

• 9 issues closed.

  • 29 April 2017

    optional values not handled correctly in test cases process w3c/data-shapes#59.

  • 29 April 2017

    requirements on sh:message not checked in test cases process w3c/data-shapes#60.

  • 27 April 2017

    status of advice in test suite document on validation reports w3c/data-shapes#56.

  • 27 April 2017

    important aspects of SHACL Core not covered by shacl-shacl shapes graph w3c/data-shapes#62.

  • 27 April 2017

    test cases process removes too much w3c/data-shapes#67.

  • 27 April 2017

    non-isomorphic but equivalent paths in validation reports w3c/data-shapes#58.

  • 27 April 2017

    no required checks for recursive shapes in SHACL implementations that do not handle recursion w3c/data-shapes#64.

  • 26 April 2017

    SHACL requirements in non-normative parts of the document w3c/data-shapes#57.

  • 18 April 2017

    clarification on the semantics of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint w3c/data-shapes#47.

• 2 issues reopened.

  • 27 April 2017

    optional values not handled correctly in test cases process w3c/data-shapes#59, by @pfps.

  • 22 April 2017

    status of advice in test suite document on validation reports w3c/data-shapes#56, by @pfps.

• 16 issues received 101 new comments.

  • Latest comment 28 April 2017

    non-redundant multiple sh:minInclusive w3c/data-shapes#68 (13 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps, @simonstey, @TallTed)

  • Latest comment 29 April 2017

    optional values not handled correctly in test cases process w3c/data-shapes#59 (11 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 29 April 2017

    inconsistent requirements for sh:focusNode w3c/data-shapes#55 (9 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 29 April 2017

    problematic cases for pre-binding w3c/data-shapes#61 (9 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 29 April 2017

    behaviour of SHACL Core implementation on shapes graphs with ill-formed SHACL-SPARQL constructs w3c/data-shapes#65 (8 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 29 April 2017

    path syntax too liberal w3c/data-shapes#75 (7 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps, @simonstey)

  • Latest comment 29 April 2017

    behaviour of SHACL Core implementations on shapes graphs with SHACL-SPARQL constructs w3c/data-shapes#63 (6 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 29 April 2017

    requirements on sh:message not checked in test cases process w3c/data-shapes#60 (6 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 27 April 2017

    denial of service security problems with SERVICE w3c/data-shapes#73 (6 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps, @swickr)

  • Latest comment 27 April 2017

    status of advice in test suite document on validation reports w3c/data-shapes#56 (6 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 27 April 2017

    non-isomorphic but equivalent paths in validation reports w3c/data-shapes#58 (6 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 27 April 2017

    no required checks for recursive shapes in SHACL implementations that do not handle recursion w3c/data-shapes#64 (5 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @irenetq, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 27 April 2017

    test cases process removes too much w3c/data-shapes#67 (4 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 26 April 2017

    SHACL requirements in non-normative parts of the document w3c/data-shapes#57 (3 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • 20 April 2017

    important aspects of SHACL Core not covered by shacl-shacl shapes graph w3c/data-shapes#62 (1 comment by @irenetq)

  • 9 April 2017

    clarification on the semantics of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint w3c/data-shapes#47 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)
• 19 pull requests opened.

  • 28 April 2017

    two tests of strange paths w3c/data-shapes#81, by @pfps.

  • 28 April 2017

    fix results for class-003 w3c/data-shapes#80, by @pfps.

  • 28 April 2017

    tests for subselect that doesn't bind $this w3c/data-shapes#79, by @pfps.

  • 28 April 2017

    tests of double sh:class, sh:minInclusive on dateTime, allowed qualified values w3c/data-shapes#78, by @pfps.

  • 28 April 2017

    test of complex path with shared pieces w3c/data-shapes#77, by @pfps.

  • 28 April 2017

    run wg's shac-shacl on itself w3c/data-shapes#76, by @pfps.

  • 26 April 2017

    SPARQL validators implemented w3c/data-shapes#74, by @nicky508.

  • 25 April 2017

    Implemented some new tests which were raised the last two weeks w3c/data-shapes#72, by @nicky508.

  • 25 April 2017

    Validated the binding tests w3c/data-shapes#71, by @nicky508.

  • 25 April 2017

    Implemented new features w3c/data-shapes#70, by @nicky508.

  • 23 April 2017

    Revert "run shacl-shacl on shacl-shacl" w3c/data-shapes#69, by @HolgerKnublauch.

  • 20 April 2017

    run shacl-shacl on shacl-shacl w3c/data-shapes#66, by @pfps.

  • 19 April 2017

    A set of tests for SPARQL Core implementations that ignore SPARQL-SHA… w3c/data-shapes#54, by @pfps.

  • 18 April 2017

    fix core/property/datatype-ill-formed validation results w3c/data-shapes#53, by @pfps.

  • 18 April 2017

    new tests w3c/data-shapes#52, by @pfps.

  • 17 April 2017

    fix up core/validation-reports/shared and sparql/pre-binding/bind tes… w3c/data-shapes#51, by @pfps.

  • 13 April 2017

    test of validation report w3c/data-shapes#50, by @pfps.

  • 13 April 2017

    Update implementation report w3c/data-shapes#49, by @nicky508.

  • 12 April 2017

    Added netage SHACL Engine implementation report w3c/data-shapes#48, by @nicky508.

• 16 pull requests merged.

  • 28 April 2017

    tests of double sh:class, sh:minInclusive on dateTime, allowed qualified values w3c/data-shapes#78.

  • 28 April 2017

    test of complex path with shared pieces w3c/data-shapes#77.

  • 28 April 2017

    run wg's shac-shacl on itself w3c/data-shapes#76.

  • 26 April 2017

    SPARQL validators implemented w3c/data-shapes#74.

  • 25 April 2017

    Implemented some new tests which were raised the last two weeks w3c/data-shapes#72.

  • 25 April 2017

    Validated the binding tests w3c/data-shapes#71.

  • 25 April 2017

    Implemented new features w3c/data-shapes#70.

  • 23 April 2017

    Revert "run shacl-shacl on shacl-shacl" w3c/data-shapes#69.

  • 23 April 2017

    run shacl-shacl on shacl-shacl w3c/data-shapes#66.

  • 20 April 2017

    A set of tests for SPARQL Core implementations that ignore SPARQL-SHA… w3c/data-shapes#54.

  • 19 April 2017

    fix core/property/datatype-ill-formed validation results w3c/data-shapes#53.

  • 18 April 2017

    new tests w3c/data-shapes#52.

  • 17 April 2017

    fix up core/validation-reports/shared and sparql/pre-binding/bind tes… w3c/data-shapes#51.

  • 16 April 2017

    test of validation report w3c/data-shapes#50.

  • 13 April 2017

    Update implementation report w3c/data-shapes#49.

  • 12 April 2017

    Added netage SHACL Engine implementation report w3c/data-shapes#48.

• 1 pull request reopened.

  • 20 April 2017

    run shacl-shacl on shacl-shacl w3c/data-shapes#66, by @pfps.

• 11 pull requests received 21 new comments.

  • Latest comment 22 April 2017

    run shacl-shacl on shacl-shacl w3c/data-shapes#66 (5 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 20 April 2017

    A set of tests for SPARQL Core implementations that ignore SPARQL-SHA… w3c/data-shapes#54 (4 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 28 April 2017

    tests of double sh:class, sh:minInclusive on dateTime, allowed qualified values w3c/data-shapes#78 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 24 April 2017

    Revert "run shacl-shacl on shacl-shacl" w3c/data-shapes#69 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • Latest comment 17 April 2017

    test of validation report w3c/data-shapes#50 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @pfps)

  • 28 April 2017

    two tests of strange paths w3c/data-shapes#81 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • 28 April 2017

    fix results for class-003 w3c/data-shapes#80 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • 28 April 2017

    test of complex path with shared pieces w3c/data-shapes#77 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • 28 April 2017

    run wg's shac-shacl on itself w3c/data-shapes#76 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • 26 April 2017

    SPARQL validators implemented w3c/data-shapes#74 (1 comment by @nicky508)

  • 12 April 2017

    Added netage SHACL Engine implementation report w3c/data-shapes#48 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

TR publications

• 1 document published.

  • 3 March 2017

    Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) published as a Working Draft. History of Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)

Participants

• 1 organization joined.

  • 29 March 2017

    Siemens AG joined.

GitHub

w3c/data-shapes

• 17 issues opened.

  • 22 March 2017

    Thank You for SHACL w3c/data-shapes#46, by @mcparmelee.

  • 17 March 2017

    Intent to use SHACL w3c/data-shapes#45, by @afk314.

  • 16 March 2017

    Reference for BCP47 w3c/data-shapes#44, by @r12a.

  • 16 March 2017

    String without the notion of a character w3c/data-shapes#43, by @r12a.

  • 16 March 2017

    Define the terms language range and the matching approach w3c/data-shapes#42, by @r12a.

  • 16 March 2017

    Handling of meaningful multiple values w3c/data-shapes#41, by @r12a.

  • 16 March 2017

    Standardized way to add indications of text direction w3c/data-shapes#40, by @r12a.

  • 16 March 2017

    RDF text strings & language w3c/data-shapes#39, by @r12a.

  • 16 March 2017

    SPARQL additions w3c/data-shapes#38, by @kurtcagle.

  • 10 March 2017

    Ambiguity in examples w3c/data-shapes#36, by @kurtcagle.

  • 9 March 2017

    Inclusion of sh:phase and sh:Phase w3c/data-shapes#35, by @kurtcagle.

  • 9 March 2017

    Feedback : Shape Graphs Usage w3c/data-shapes#34, by @pzerva.

  • 9 March 2017

    Feedback: Evidence of interest in SHACL w3c/data-shapes#33, by @gregor5555.

  • 8 March 2017

    Problems editing SHACL with Protégé w3c/data-shapes#32, by @HolgerKnublauch.

  • 7 March 2017

    sh:query non-normative? w3c/data-shapes#29, by @jhodgesatsbl.

  • 6 March 2017

    Wrong predicate in sh:disjoint description w3c/data-shapes#28, by @robert-david.

  • 3 March 2017

    Plans to use and implement w3c/data-shapes#27, by @csarven.

• 22 issues closed.

  • 22 March 2017

    Problems editing SHACL with Protégé w3c/data-shapes#32.

  • 22 March 2017

    Ambiguity in examples w3c/data-shapes#36.

  • 22 March 2017

    Thank You for SHACL w3c/data-shapes#46.

  • 22 March 2017

    Reference for BCP47 w3c/data-shapes#44.

  • 22 March 2017

    String without the notion of a character w3c/data-shapes#43.

  • 22 March 2017

    Define the terms language range and the matching approach w3c/data-shapes#42.

  • 22 March 2017

    Standardized way to add indications of text direction w3c/data-shapes#40.

  • 21 March 2017

    References not rendering (Firefox 51.0.1) w3c/data-shapes#26.

  • 21 March 2017

    Plans to use and implement w3c/data-shapes#27.

  • 21 March 2017

    Feedback: Evidence of interest in SHACL w3c/data-shapes#33.

  • 21 March 2017

    Feedback : Shape Graphs Usage w3c/data-shapes#34.

  • 21 March 2017

    Intent to use SHACL w3c/data-shapes#45.

  • 17 March 2017

    Handling of meaningful multiple values w3c/data-shapes#41.

  • 17 March 2017

    RDF text strings & language w3c/data-shapes#39.

  • 16 March 2017

    SPARQL additions w3c/data-shapes#38.

  • 16 March 2017

    Inclusion of sh:phase and sh:Phase w3c/data-shapes#35.

  • 7 March 2017

    sh:query non-normative? w3c/data-shapes#29.

  • 6 March 2017

    Wrong predicate in sh:disjoint description w3c/data-shapes#28.

  • 3 March 2017

    Re 4.2.3 sh:nodeKind: provide an instance for the combination of all kinds w3c/data-shapes#24.

  • 3 March 2017

    Re 4.2.3 sh:nodeKind: add a notice about putting a constraint on nodes to be blank nodes w3c/data-shapes#25.

  • 3 March 2017

    what about reification? w3c/data-shapes#3.

  • 3 March 2017

    Page not found for ldom.ttl w3c/data-shapes#4.

• 15 issues received 36 new comments.

  • Latest comment 22 March 2017

    Define the terms language range and the matching approach w3c/data-shapes#42 (7 comments by @aphillips, @fsasaki, @HolgerKnublauch, @sandhawke)

  • Latest comment 22 March 2017

    String without the notion of a character w3c/data-shapes#43 (4 comments by @fsasaki, @HolgerKnublauch)

  • Latest comment 22 March 2017

    Ambiguity in examples w3c/data-shapes#36 (4 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @kurtcagle)

  • Latest comment 22 March 2017

    Standardized way to add indications of text direction w3c/data-shapes#40 (3 comments by @fsasaki, @HolgerKnublauch)

  • Latest comment 22 March 2017

    Problems editing SHACL with Protégé w3c/data-shapes#32 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • Latest comment 22 March 2017

    Reference for BCP47 w3c/data-shapes#44 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • Latest comment 21 March 2017

    References not rendering (Firefox 51.0.1) w3c/data-shapes#26 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @simonstey)

  • Latest comment 16 March 2017

    SPARQL additions w3c/data-shapes#38 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @kurtcagle)

  • Latest comment 16 March 2017

    Feedback: Evidence of interest in SHACL w3c/data-shapes#33 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @kurtcagle)

  • Latest comment 16 March 2017

    Inclusion of sh:phase and sh:Phase w3c/data-shapes#35 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @kurtcagle)

  • Latest comment 7 March 2017

    sh:query non-normative? w3c/data-shapes#29 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • 22 March 2017

    Thank You for SHACL w3c/data-shapes#46 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • 15 March 2017

    Re 4.2.3 sh:nodeKind: add a notice about putting a constraint on nodes to be blank nodes w3c/data-shapes#25 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • 15 March 2017

    Re 4.2.3 sh:nodeKind: provide an instance for the combination of all kinds w3c/data-shapes#24 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • 6 March 2017

    Wrong predicate in sh:disjoint description w3c/data-shapes#28 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)
• 3 pull requests opened.

  • 14 March 2017

    ACTION-48 : some changes based on first review w3c/data-shapes#37, by @pmaria.

  • 7 March 2017

    rdf:List typo fix w3c/data-shapes#31, by @pmaria.

  • 7 March 2017

    ACTION-48: Produce a json-ld @context draft w3c/data-shapes#30, by @pmaria.

• 3 pull requests merged.

  • 14 March 2017

    ACTION-48 : some changes based on first review w3c/data-shapes#37.

  • 7 March 2017

    ACTION-48: Produce a json-ld @context draft w3c/data-shapes#30.

  • 7 March 2017

    rdf:List typo fix w3c/data-shapes#31.

• 2 pull requests closed.

  • 16 March 2017

    examples use tabular summary w3c/data-shapes#22.

  • 16 March 2017

    validation filter ordering w3c/data-shapes#23.

• 2 pull requests received 2 new comments.

  • 16 March 2017

    examples use tabular summary w3c/data-shapes#22 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • 16 March 2017

    validation filter ordering w3c/data-shapes#23 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

TR publications

• 1 document published.

  • 2 February 2017

    Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) published as a Working Draft. History of Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)

Participants

• 1 participant joined.

  • 17 February 2017

    Sandro Hawke (W3C) joined.

• 1 organization joined.

  • 8 February 2017

    QUDT joined.

GitHub

w3c/data-shapes

• 1 issue opened.

  • 8 February 2017

    References not rendering (Firefox 51.0.1) w3c/data-shapes#26, by @simonstey.

• 1 issue received 2 new comments.

  • Latest comment 8 February 2017

    References not rendering (Firefox 51.0.1) w3c/data-shapes#26 (2 comments by @HolgerKnublauch, @simonstey)

Participants

• 1 organization left.

  • 28 January 2017

    IBM Corporation left.

GitHub

w3c/data-shapes

• 2 issues received 2 new comments.

  • 2 January 2017

    Re 4.2.3 sh:nodeKind: add a notice about putting a constraint on nodes to be blank nodes w3c/data-shapes#25 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)

  • 2 January 2017

    Re 4.2.3 sh:nodeKind: provide an instance for the combination of all kinds w3c/data-shapes#24 (1 comment by @HolgerKnublauch)