Web Annotation Working Group - Activity in 2015
No matches.
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
8 issues opened.
-
"Text class" not defined w3c/web-annotation#129, by @akuckartz.
-
Ensure context terms do not collide with URI schemes w3c/web-annotation#126, by @azaroth42.
-
MIME Type for Annotation Model w3c/web-annotation#125, by @shepazu.
-
Do we need a separate media type for annotations? w3c/web-annotation#124, by @iherman.
-
Documentation error - language code in Example 17 is incorrect w3c/web-annotation#120, by @iainsproat.
-
How do we model "groups" in the Annotation model? w3c/web-annotation#119, by @shepazu.
-
External: Reflect Protocol in Social Web Protocols document w3c/web-annotation#118, by @azaroth42.
-
anno-ACTION-29: Create draft proposal for rendering state/selector w3c/web-annotation#117, by @BigBlueHat.
-
-
3 issues closed.
-
Do we need a separate media type for annotations? w3c/web-annotation#124.
-
Support for search w3c/web-annotation#48.
-
Newline escaping in embedded content w3c/web-annotation#64.
-
-
22 issues received 105 new comments.
-
How do we model "groups" in the Annotation model? w3c/web-annotation#119 (18 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @dwhly, @iherman, @jjett, @nickstenning, @shepazu, @tcole3)
-
Justify each Motivation with a behavior w3c/web-annotation#113 (12 comments by @fhirsch, @gsergiu, @rtroncy, @tilgovi)
-
MIME Type for Annotation Model w3c/web-annotation#125 (11 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @iherman, @shepazu)
-
Support for Notification w3c/web-annotation#49 (11 comments by @azaroth42, @csarven, @gobengo, @iherman, @rhiaro)
-
Annotation alsoKnownAs <uri> w3c/web-annotation#21 (9 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman, @paolociccarese, @shepazu)
-
Rename `role` to `motive` w3c/web-annotation#112 (8 comments by @BigBlueHat, @gandreini, @gsergiu, @iherman, @rtroncy)
-
Newline escaping in embedded content w3c/web-annotation#64 (5 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @gobengo)
-
Embedding annotations in the target document w3c/web-annotation#87 (4 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @csarven)
-
Define json-ld profile URI for OA serialization context and structure w3c/web-annotation#30 (3 comments by @iherman, @shepazu)
-
Make Selectors available for the wide world? w3c/web-annotation#110 (3 comments by @davis-salisbury, @iherman, @tilgovi)
-
Client can't determine if user has authorization to modify annotation w3c/web-annotation#19 (3 comments by @iherman, @nickstenning)
-
Split model into vocab and model+json-ld w3c/web-annotation#97 (3 comments by @cmbirk, @davis-salisbury, @iherman)
-
ActivityStreams / Annotation comparison w3c/web-annotation#102 (2 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat)
-
Add `mbox_sha1sum` for the same reason(s) FOAF did w3c/web-annotation#115 (2 comments by @BigBlueHat, @iherman)
-
Documentation error - language code in Example 17 is incorrect w3c/web-annotation#120 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
-
5 pull requests opened.
-
Added examples w3c/web-annotation#128, by @pciccarese.
-
More examples: created, creator, homepage, name, nick, wasGeneratedBy… w3c/web-annotation#127, by @paolociccarese.
-
[model] Update to paging, simplification w3c/web-annotation#123, by @azaroth42.
-
DCMI Metadata Terms examples w3c/web-annotation#122, by @paolociccarese.
-
Add vocab w3c/web-annotation#121, by @azaroth42.
-
-
6 pull requests merged.
-
Added examples w3c/web-annotation#128.
-
[model] Update to paging, simplification w3c/web-annotation#123.
-
DCMI Metadata Terms examples w3c/web-annotation#122.
-
Add vocab w3c/web-annotation#121.
-
Model to web annotation json ld doc w3c/web-annotation#99.
-
Add @context to table, correct example typos w3c/web-annotation#114.
-
-
4 pull requests received 6 new comments.
w3c/findtext
-
1 issue opened.
-
Usage (or not) of Promise in ``search`` w3c/findtext#19, by @iherman.
-
-
2 issues received 3 new comments.
Participants
-
2 participants joined.
-
Sarven Capadisli (W3C Invited Experts) joined.
-
Randall Leeds (W3C Invited Experts) joined.
-
-
1 organization joined.
-
University of Edinburgh joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
22 issues opened.
-
Clarify Selectors w3c/web-annotation#116, by @azaroth42.
-
Add `mbox_sha1sum` for the same reason(s) FOAF did w3c/web-annotation#115, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Justify each Motivation with a behavior w3c/web-annotation#113, by @shepazu.
-
Rename `role` to `motive` w3c/web-annotation#112, by @shepazu.
-
Define the usage of ‘modified’ w3c/web-annotation#111, by @pciccarese.
-
Make Selectors available for the wide world? w3c/web-annotation#110, by @iherman.
-
Narrow `hasScope` to match `as:scope` and introduct `as:context` w3c/web-annotation#109, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Clarify "existing standards" in section 1.1 w3c/web-annotation#108, by @jpstroop.
-
Selecting more than text w3c/web-annotation#107, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Embedded Targets w3c/web-annotation#105, by @csarven.
-
Allow >1 role per resource w3c/web-annotation#104, by @azaroth42.
-
http/https? w3c/web-annotation#103, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
ActivityStreams / Annotation comparison w3c/web-annotation#102, by @azaroth42.
-
Do we need an `annotates` relationship for use in RDF and/or Link Relationships? w3c/web-annotation#101, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Associate license with content w3c/web-annotation#100, by @azaroth42.
-
Clarify ability to reason with annotations - note additional statements to add to reasoner w3c/web-annotation#98, by @fhirsch.
-
Split model into vocab and model+json-ld w3c/web-annotation#97, by @azaroth42.
-
Annotation updated timestamp w3c/web-annotation#96, by @azaroth42.
-
XPath Selector w3c/web-annotation#95, by @azaroth42.
-
CSS Selector w3c/web-annotation#94, by @azaroth42.
-
Multiple Selectors w3c/web-annotation#93, by @azaroth42.
-
Multiplicity and Collections w3c/web-annotation#92, by @azaroth42.
-
-
7 issues closed.
-
Allow literals directly as a body? w3c/web-annotation#13.
-
Do we need modules for the specification? w3c/web-annotation#9.
-
Clarify ability to reason with annotations - note additional statements to add to reasoner w3c/web-annotation#98.
-
http/https? w3c/web-annotation#103.
-
Narrow `hasScope` to match `as:scope` and introduct `as:context` w3c/web-annotation#109.
-
Embedded Targets w3c/web-annotation#105.
-
Do we need an `annotates` relationship for use in RDF and/or Link Relationships? w3c/web-annotation#101.
-
-
5 issues reopened.
-
ActivityStreams / Annotation comparison w3c/web-annotation#102, by @azaroth42.
-
Make Selectors available for the wide world? w3c/web-annotation#110, by @iherman.
-
Associate license with content w3c/web-annotation#100, by @azaroth42.
-
Allow >1 role per resource w3c/web-annotation#104, by @iherman.
-
Clarify ability to reason with annotations - note additional statements to add to reasoner w3c/web-annotation#98, by @tilgovi.
-
-
34 issues received 236 new comments.
-
XPath Selector w3c/web-annotation#95 (25 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @fhirsch, @liamquin, @tbdinesh, @tilgovi, @tkanai)
-
Make Selectors available for the wide world? w3c/web-annotation#110 (23 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @gobengo, @iherman, @jjett, @kevinmarks, @tilgovi)
-
Allow >1 role per resource w3c/web-annotation#104 (19 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman, @jjett, @shepazu)
-
Clarify ability to reason with annotations - note additional statements to add to reasoner w3c/web-annotation#98 (15 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @fhirsch, @jjett, @tilgovi)
-
Rename `role` to `motive` w3c/web-annotation#112 (14 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @gobengo, @iherman, @jjett, @shepazu, @tilgovi)
-
Simplifying hasBody w3c/web-annotation#79 (13 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman, @jjett)
-
http/https? w3c/web-annotation#103 (12 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @csarven, @iherman, @VladimirAlexiev)
-
Split model into vocab and model+json-ld w3c/web-annotation#97 (10 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @gobengo, @iherman, @jjett, @shepazu)
-
Annotation updated timestamp w3c/web-annotation#96 (10 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman, @jbenet)
-
Define json-ld profile URI for OA serialization context and structure w3c/web-annotation#30 (9 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman)
-
Add `mbox_sha1sum` for the same reason(s) FOAF did w3c/web-annotation#115 (8 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @shepazu)
-
Multiplicity and Collections w3c/web-annotation#92 (8 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman, @jjett)
-
Associate license with content w3c/web-annotation#100 (8 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman)
-
Justify each Motivation with a behavior w3c/web-annotation#113 (7 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman, @jjett, @shepazu)
-
Annotation alsoKnownAs <uri> w3c/web-annotation#21 (6 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman)
-
ActivityStreams / Annotation comparison w3c/web-annotation#102 (6 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @jasnell)
-
Do we need an `annotates` relationship for use in RDF and/or Link Relationships? w3c/web-annotation#101 (6 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman)
-
Embedding annotations in the target document w3c/web-annotation#87 (3 comments by @azaroth42, @csarven, @iherman)
-
Draft "Client-Side API for Annotations" w3c/web-annotation#32 (3 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @gobengo)
-
Publish a temporary testing JSON-LD context doc for use with JSON-LD Playground (etc) w3c/web-annotation#71 (2 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat)
-
Narrow `hasScope` to match `as:scope` and introduct `as:context` w3c/web-annotation#109 (2 comments by @BigBlueHat, @iherman)
-
Clarify "existing standards" in section 1.1 w3c/web-annotation#108 (2 comments by @azaroth42, @jpstroop)
-
Create reference set of correct/incorrect annotations for test development w3c/web-annotation#55 (2 comments by @BigBlueHat, @gobengo)
-
Emerging best practice is to use id/type aliases for @id/@type w3c/web-annotation#88 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
-
4 pull requests opened.
-
Add @context to table, correct example typos w3c/web-annotation#114, by @azaroth42.
-
Fix examples output w3c/web-annotation#106, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Model to web annotation json ld doc w3c/web-annotation#99, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Add @context back to examples w3c/web-annotation#91, by @BigBlueHat.
-
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
Fix examples output w3c/web-annotation#106.
-
Add @context back to examples w3c/web-annotation#91.
-
-
2 pull requests received 2 new comments.
w3c/findtext
-
1 issue received 3 new comments.
TR publications
-
2 documents published.
-
Web Annotation Data Model published as a Working Draft. History of Web Annotation Data Model
-
FindText API published as a First Public Working Draft. History of FindText API
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
4 issues opened.
-
Emerging best practice is to use id/type aliases for @id/@type w3c/web-annotation#88, by @azaroth42.
-
Embedding annotations in the target document w3c/web-annotation#87, by @azaroth42.
-
Allow pool of "tags" on Annotation w3c/web-annotation#86, by @azaroth42.
-
Protocol should include Accept-Post requirement from LDP w3c/web-annotation#85, by @azaroth42.
-
-
16 issues closed.
-
Emerging best practice is to use id/type aliases for @id/@type w3c/web-annotation#88.
-
Should the namespace change? w3c/web-annotation#53.
-
is, has and alike are implied w3c/web-annotation#70.
-
JSON-LD contexts for Model/Protocol w3c/web-annotation#36.
-
JSON-LD Profile Definition: Where? w3c/web-annotation#35.
-
Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? w3c/web-annotation#40.
-
Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? w3c/web-annotation#52.
-
Remove "dereference" requirements from the Model w3c/web-annotation#60.
-
Dropping type from ... what? w3c/web-annotation#67.
-
Clarify TextQuoteSelector without prefix/suffix w3c/web-annotation#76.
-
typo in Model: "Core document" w3c/web-annotation#78.
-
Unable to have a graph as the body of an annotation w3c/web-annotation#16.
-
xsd: prefix not defined in appendix w3c/web-annotation#28.
-
Add RFC7111 to FragmentSelector list w3c/web-annotation#26.
-
Allow full SVG in SvgSelector? w3c/web-annotation#17.
-
Expanded role for agents' activities w3c/web-annotation#7.
-
-
26 issues received 45 new comments.
-
Emerging best practice is to use id/type aliases for @id/@type w3c/web-annotation#88 (8 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @danbri, @jasnell, @tilgovi)
-
Annotation alsoKnownAs <uri> w3c/web-annotation#21 (8 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @rtroncy, @tilgovi)
-
Unable to have a graph as the body of an annotation w3c/web-annotation#16 (3 comments by @azaroth42, @stain)
-
Define json-ld profile URI for OA serialization context and structure w3c/web-annotation#30 (2 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42)
-
Publish a temporary testing JSON-LD context doc for use with JSON-LD Playground (etc) w3c/web-annotation#71 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? w3c/web-annotation#40 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
-
6 pull requests opened.
-
Bring back context w3c/web-annotation#90, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Change @id/@type to id/type w3c/web-annotation#89, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Fix Note Well in 3.1 Annotations w3c/web-annotation#84, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Anchors away w3c/web-annotation#83, by @BigBlueHat.
-
rerun respec w3c/web-annotation#82, by @azaroth42.
-
Merge new WD for Model for publication w3c/web-annotation#81, by @azaroth42.
-
-
6 pull requests merged.
-
Bring back context w3c/web-annotation#90.
-
Change @id/@type to id/type w3c/web-annotation#89.
-
Fix Note Well in 3.1 Annotations w3c/web-annotation#84.
-
Anchors away w3c/web-annotation#83.
-
rerun respec w3c/web-annotation#82.
-
Merge new WD for Model for publication w3c/web-annotation#81.
-
-
3 pull requests received 3 new comments.
w3c/findtext
-
17 issues opened.
-
Too many parameters/complexity? w3c/findtext#18, by @azaroth42.
-
Which object exposes findtext()? w3c/findtext#17, by @azaroth42.
-
Tree to Text algorithm needed? w3c/findtext#16, by @azaroth42.
-
Select text from a column in a <table> w3c/findtext#15, by @azaroth42.
-
CSS moved/generated/hidden text? w3c/findtext#14, by @azaroth42.
-
i18n-ISSUE-505: Diacritic matching sentence in intro w3c/findtext#13, by @r12a.
-
order of case fold and normalization operations [I18N-ISSUE-503] w3c/findtext#12, by @aphillips.
-
Unicode equivalent type all not clear [I18N-ISSUE-502] w3c/findtext#11, by @aphillips.
-
i18n-ISSUE-504: ASCII case fold not useful w3c/findtext#10, by @r12a.
-
Meta: Issues are not echoed to WG Mailing List w3c/findtext#9, by @azaroth42.
-
Unicode equivalence type non-specificity [I18N-ISSUE-501] w3c/findtext#8, by @aphillips.
-
definitions of ASCII and Unicode case folds [I18N-ISSUE-499] w3c/findtext#7, by @aphillips.
-
language-sensitive case fold type needs more information [I18N-ISSUE-498] w3c/findtext#6, by @aphillips.
-
avoid listing whitespace characters [I18N-ISSUE-497] w3c/findtext#5, by @aphillips.
-
note about character counts [I18N-ISSUE-496] w3c/findtext#4, by @aphillips.
-
Support for Regex w3c/findtext#1, by @krusynth.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
4 issues received 7 new comments.
-
1 pull request opened.
-
fixing typos w3c/findtext#2, by @dret.
-
Participants
-
1 organization joined.
-
NIC.br - Brazilian Network Information Center joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
5 issues opened.
-
Add JSON-LD Frame as informative annex w3c/web-annotation#80, by @azaroth42.
-
Simplifying hasBody w3c/web-annotation#79, by @csarven.
-
typo in Model: "Core document" w3c/web-annotation#78, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
typo in Protocol: rdf:label w3c/web-annotation#77, by @VladimirAlexiev.
-
Clarify TextQuoteSelector without prefix/suffix w3c/web-annotation#76, by @azaroth42.
-
-
9 issues closed.
-
PROV-O Mapping w3c/web-annotation#65.
-
Role of Target/Body w.r.t. the Annnotation? w3c/web-annotation#11.
-
JSON-LD Context keys w3c/web-annotation#12.
-
Annotation protocol available or not? w3c/web-annotation#20.
-
Update skos:related to skos:exactMatch for semantic tags w3c/web-annotation#29.
-
Require dct:Text class for interpretation of literal bodies w3c/web-annotation#31.
-
Create dereferenceable JSON-LD context document w3c/web-annotation#54.
-
avoid constraining HTTP w3c/web-annotation#51.
-
Should we systematically use typing in the model (and in the examples)? w3c/web-annotation#61.
-
-
20 issues received 70 new comments.
-
is, has and alike are implied w3c/web-annotation#70 (17 comments by @azaroth42, @csarven, @fhirsch, @iherman, @shepazu, @tcole3, @tilgovi)
-
Make Turtle support optional? w3c/web-annotation#34 (12 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman, @melvincarvalho, @tilgovi)
-
Clarify TextQuoteSelector without prefix/suffix w3c/web-annotation#76 (4 comments by @BigBlueHat, @jjett, @shepazu, @tilgovi)
-
Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? w3c/web-annotation#52 (2 comments by @azaroth42, @iherman)
-
Publish a temporary testing JSON-LD context doc for use with JSON-LD Playground (etc) w3c/web-annotation#71 (2 comments by @BigBlueHat, @iherman)
-
Update skos:related to skos:exactMatch for semantic tags w3c/web-annotation#29 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
Require dct:Text class for interpretation of literal bodies w3c/web-annotation#31 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
Should we systematically use typing in the model (and in the examples)? w3c/web-annotation#61 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Add Multiple Text Tag example w3c/web-annotation#75, by @BigBlueHat.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Add Multiple Text Tag example w3c/web-annotation#75.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
9 issues opened.
-
Publish a temporary testing JSON-LD context doc for use with JSON-LD Playground (etc) w3c/web-annotation#71, by @BigBlueHat.
-
is, has and alike are implied w3c/web-annotation#70, by @csarven.
-
Dropping type from ... what? w3c/web-annotation#67, by @azaroth42.
-
Keeping the OA ontology up to date w3c/web-annotation#66, by @csarven.
-
PROV-O Mapping w3c/web-annotation#65, by @csarven.
-
Newline escaping in embedded content w3c/web-annotation#64, by @azaroth42.
-
format in the model for Embeded Textual Body? w3c/web-annotation#63, by @iherman.
-
Should we systematically use typing in the model (and in the examples)? w3c/web-annotation#61, by @iherman.
-
Remove "dereference" requirements from the Model w3c/web-annotation#60, by @azaroth42.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
format in the model for Embeded Textual Body? w3c/web-annotation#63.
-
-
8 issues received 62 new comments.
-
Dropping type from ... what? w3c/web-annotation#67 (26 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @csarven, @iherman, @jjett, @shepazu, @stain, @tcole3, @tkanai)
-
is, has and alike are implied w3c/web-annotation#70 (12 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @csarven, @cygri, @danbri, @deiu, @jjett, @melvincarvalho, @shepazu, @stain, @tcole3)
-
format in the model for Embeded Textual Body? w3c/web-annotation#63 (9 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman)
-
Publish a temporary testing JSON-LD context doc for use with JSON-LD Playground (etc) w3c/web-annotation#71 (4 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman)
-
Should we systematically use typing in the model (and in the examples)? w3c/web-annotation#61 (4 comments by @azaroth42, @iherman, @tilgovi)
-
-
6 pull requests opened.
-
Example URI changes w3c/web-annotation#74, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Add my info to Roles document editors w3c/web-annotation#73, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Small tweaks to a sentence in 3.2.3 w3c/web-annotation#72, by @BigBlueHat.
-
The spec status of the roles' document set to 'base' w3c/web-annotation#69, by @iherman.
-
Adding oa.ttl and friends w3c/web-annotation#68, by @stain.
-
Made the changes on the JSON LD context w3c/web-annotation#62, by @iherman.
-
-
5 pull requests merged.
-
Example URI changes w3c/web-annotation#74.
-
Add my info to Roles document editors w3c/web-annotation#73.
-
Small tweaks to a sentence in 3.2.3 w3c/web-annotation#72.
-
Adding oa.ttl and friends w3c/web-annotation#68.
-
Made the changes on the JSON LD context w3c/web-annotation#62.
-
-
1 pull request closed.
-
The spec status of the roles' document set to 'base' w3c/web-annotation#69.
-
-
2 pull requests received 2 new comments.
-
The spec status of the roles' document set to 'base' w3c/web-annotation#69 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
TR publications
-
1 document published.
-
Web Annotation Protocol published as a First Public Working Draft. History of Web Annotation Protocol
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
15 issues opened.
-
Text Position Selector in the DOM w3c/web-annotation#59, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Absolute or relative URI's in examples w3c/web-annotation#57, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Update protocol WD from 2015-07-22 call w3c/web-annotation#56, by @azaroth42.
-
Create reference set of correct/incorrect annotations for test development w3c/web-annotation#55, by @azaroth42.
-
Create dereferenceable JSON-LD context document w3c/web-annotation#54, by @azaroth42.
-
Should the namespace change? w3c/web-annotation#53, by @azaroth42.
-
Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? w3c/web-annotation#52, by @tkanai.
-
avoid constraining HTTP w3c/web-annotation#51, by @dret.
-
Annotation Lists w3c/web-annotation#50, by @azaroth42.
-
Support for Notification w3c/web-annotation#49, by @azaroth42.
-
Support for search w3c/web-annotation#48, by @azaroth42.
-
add reference to Annotation Protocol to Model w3c/web-annotation#47, by @fhirsch.
-
"Open" or "Web" Annotation w3c/web-annotation#46, by @azaroth42.
-
Add reference for "LDP Container" w3c/web-annotation#45, by @AFBarstow.
-
Add reference to CORS w3c/web-annotation#44, by @AFBarstow.
-
-
7 issues closed.
-
Absolute or relative URI's in examples w3c/web-annotation#57.
-
Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer w3c/web-annotation#37.
-
Clarify status of specification table in 4.2.1 w3c/web-annotation#27.
-
Update protocol WD from 2015-07-22 call w3c/web-annotation#56.
-
Add reference for "LDP Container" w3c/web-annotation#45.
-
Add reference to CORS w3c/web-annotation#44.
-
"Open" or "Web" Annotation w3c/web-annotation#46.
-
-
17 issues received 100 new comments.
-
Yet Another JSON-LD the protocol spec to use? w3c/web-annotation#52 (25 comments by @azaroth42, @dret, @gobengo, @iherman, @tilgovi, @tkanai)
-
avoid constraining HTTP w3c/web-annotation#51 (25 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @dret, @fhirsch, @iherman, @tilgovi)
-
"Open" or "Web" Annotation w3c/web-annotation#46 (14 comments by @azaroth42, @fhirsch, @iherman, @raydAtLC, @shepazu, @tilgovi)
-
Make Turtle support optional? w3c/web-annotation#34 (9 comments by @akuckartz, @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @melvincarvalho)
-
Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer w3c/web-annotation#37 (3 comments by @azaroth42, @tcole3)
-
Absolute or relative URI's in examples w3c/web-annotation#57 (2 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat)
-
Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? w3c/web-annotation#40 (2 comments by @azaroth42, @fhirsch)
-
Create reference set of correct/incorrect annotations for test development w3c/web-annotation#55 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
Client can't determine if user has authorization to modify annotation w3c/web-annotation#19 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
-
4 pull requests opened.
-
Made all Turtle URIs absolute w3c/web-annotation#58, by @BigBlueHat.
-
Use "Web" rather than "Open" Annotation? w3c/web-annotation#43, by @AFBarstow.
-
ED's URL should be "live" spec w3c/web-annotation#42, by @AFBarstow.
-
Fix typo w3c/web-annotation#41, by @AFBarstow.
-
-
4 pull requests merged.
-
Made all Turtle URIs absolute w3c/web-annotation#58.
-
Use "Web" rather than "Open" Annotation? w3c/web-annotation#43.
-
ED's URL should be "live" spec w3c/web-annotation#42.
-
Fix typo w3c/web-annotation#41.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Chris Birk (W3C Invited Experts) joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
7 issues opened.
-
Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? w3c/web-annotation#40, by @iherman.
-
Should all responses have the anno json-ld profile? w3c/web-annotation#39, by @azaroth42.
-
TLDR prevention at beginning? of Protocol w3c/web-annotation#38, by @azaroth42.
-
Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer w3c/web-annotation#37, by @azaroth42.
-
JSON-LD contexts for Model/Protocol w3c/web-annotation#36, by @azaroth42.
-
JSON-LD Profile Definition: Where? w3c/web-annotation#35, by @azaroth42.
-
Make Turtle support optional? w3c/web-annotation#34, by @azaroth42.
-
-
2 issues closed.
-
Multiple JSON-LD Contexts w3c/web-annotation#22.
-
Non-Annotation Containers not in scope for Protocol w3c/web-annotation#25.
-
-
7 issues received 28 new comments.
-
Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? w3c/web-annotation#40 (8 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @BillKasdorf, @iherman, @jjett, @paolociccarese)
-
Should all responses have the anno json-ld profile? w3c/web-annotation#39 (6 comments by @azaroth42, @cmbirk, @fhirsch, @iherman, @pciccarese, @tilgovi)
-
TLDR prevention at beginning? of Protocol w3c/web-annotation#38 (6 comments by @cmbirk, @fhirsch, @iherman, @paolociccarese, @tilgovi)
-
Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer w3c/web-annotation#37 (4 comments by @azaroth42, @iherman)
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Add links to other docs; underline links w3c/web-annotation#33, by @BigBlueHat.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Add links to other docs; underline links w3c/web-annotation#33.
-
Participants
-
1 organization joined.
-
Base22 joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
1 issue opened.
-
Draft "Client-Side API for Annotations" w3c/web-annotation#32, by @gobengo.
-
-
1 issue received 3 new comments.
-
Draft "Client-Side API for Annotations" w3c/web-annotation#32 (3 comments by @azaroth42, @gobengo, @tilgovi)
-
Participants
-
1 participant left.
-
Antonio Olmo Titos (W3C) left.
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
3 issues opened.
-
Require dct:Text class for interpretation of literal bodies w3c/web-annotation#31, by @azaroth42.
-
Define json-ld profile URI for OA serialization context and structure w3c/web-annotation#30, by @azaroth42.
-
Update skos:related to skos:exactMatch for semantic tags w3c/web-annotation#29, by @azaroth42.
-
-
6 issues received 19 new comments.
-
Intended Audience for Annotation w3c/web-annotation#8 (7 comments by @azaroth42, @BigBlueHat, @iherman, @tilgovi)
-
Allow full SVG in SvgSelector? w3c/web-annotation#17 (5 comments by @azaroth42, @jjett, @pciccarese, @stain)
-
Expanded role for agents' activities w3c/web-annotation#7 (3 comments by @azaroth42, @jjett, @paolociccarese)
-
Require dct:Text class for interpretation of literal bodies w3c/web-annotation#31 (2 comments by @azaroth42, @iherman)
-
Define json-ld profile URI for OA serialization context and structure w3c/web-annotation#30 (1 comment by @iherman)
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
3 issues opened.
-
xsd: prefix not defined in appendix w3c/web-annotation#28, by @gkellogg.
-
Clarify status of specification table in 4.2.1 w3c/web-annotation#27, by @azaroth42.
-
Add RFC7111 to FragmentSelector list w3c/web-annotation#26, by @azaroth42.
-
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
10 issues opened.
-
Non-Annotation Containers not in scope for Protocol w3c/web-annotation#25, by @azaroth42.
-
Model principles should state that inferencing is not a priority w3c/web-annotation#24, by @azaroth42.
-
Unable to unsubscribe from mailing list w3c/web-annotation#23, by @morbus.
-
Multiple JSON-LD Contexts w3c/web-annotation#22, by @azaroth42.
-
Annotation alsoKnownAs <uri> w3c/web-annotation#21, by @azaroth42.
-
Annotation protocol available or not? w3c/web-annotation#20, by @azaroth42.
-
Client can't determine if user has authorization to modify annotation w3c/web-annotation#19, by @azaroth42.
-
Recommend StillImage instead of Image? w3c/web-annotation#18, by @azaroth42.
-
Allow full SVG in SvgSelector? w3c/web-annotation#17, by @azaroth42.
-
Unable to have a graph as the body of an annotation w3c/web-annotation#16, by @azaroth42.
-
-
6 issues closed.
-
Allow Digitally Signed Annotations w3c/web-annotation#6.
-
Unable to unsubscribe from mailing list w3c/web-annotation#23.
-
Distinguishing Semantic Tags from Information Resources w3c/web-annotation#4.
-
Embedded Content w3c/web-annotation#3.
-
Choice should have a priority order w3c/web-annotation#2.
-
Serialization of Lists w3c/web-annotation#1.
-
-
15 issues received 30 new comments.
-
Allow Digitally Signed Annotations w3c/web-annotation#6 (8 comments by @azaroth42, @fhirsch, @stain, @tilgovi)
-
Annotation protocol available or not? w3c/web-annotation#20 (3 comments by @raydAtLC, @stain, @tilgovi)
-
Unable to have a graph as the body of an annotation w3c/web-annotation#16 (2 comments by @azaroth42, @zoggy)
-
Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished? w3c/web-annotation#10 (2 comments by @azaroth42, @raydAtLC)
-
Client can't determine if user has authorization to modify annotation w3c/web-annotation#19 (2 comments by @paolociccarese, @tilgovi)
-
Distinguishing Semantic Tags from Information Resources w3c/web-annotation#4 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Frederick Hirsch (W3C Invited Experts) joined.
-
-
1 organization joined.
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) joined.
-