Web Annotation Working Group - Activity in 2014
No matches.
TR publications
-
1 document published.
-
Web Annotation Data Model published as a First Public Working Draft. History of Web Annotation Data Model
-
Participants
-
2 organizations joined.
-
Sony Group Corporation joined.
-
Wiley joined.
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
T B Dinesh (W3C Invited Experts) joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
1 issue closed.
-
Do we need both Composite and List? w3c/web-annotation#5.
-
-
5 issues received 38 new comments.
-
Allow literals directly as a body? w3c/web-annotation#13 (31 comments by @azaroth42, @iherman, @jjett, @stain, @tilgovi, @zoggy)
-
Allow Digitally Signed Annotations w3c/web-annotation#6 (4 comments by @azaroth42, @shepazu, @tilgovi)
-
Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished? w3c/web-annotation#10 (1 comment by @azaroth42)
-
-
2 pull requests opened.
-
Disposition of Luc's comments w3c/web-annotation#15, by @azaroth42.
-
Fixes from Tim Cole, Paolo w3c/web-annotation#14, by @azaroth42.
-
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
Disposition of Luc's comments w3c/web-annotation#15.
-
Fixes from Tim Cole, Paolo w3c/web-annotation#14.
-
Participants
-
3 organizations joined.
-
Defense Information Systems Agency joined.
-
Tencent joined.
-
Trinity College Dublin joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
11 issues opened.
-
Allow literals directly as a body? w3c/web-annotation#13, by @azaroth42.
-
JSON-LD Context keys w3c/web-annotation#12, by @azaroth42.
-
Role of Target/Body w.r.t. the Annnotation? w3c/web-annotation#11, by @azaroth42.
-
Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished? w3c/web-annotation#10, by @azaroth42.
-
Do we need modules for the specification? w3c/web-annotation#9, by @azaroth42.
-
Intended Audience for Annotation w3c/web-annotation#8, by @azaroth42.
-
Expanded role for agents' activities w3c/web-annotation#7, by @azaroth42.
-
Allow Digitally Signed Annotations w3c/web-annotation#6, by @azaroth42.
-
Do we need both Composite and List? w3c/web-annotation#5, by @azaroth42.
-
Distinguishing Semantic Tags from Information Resources w3c/web-annotation#4, by @azaroth42.
-
Embedded Content w3c/web-annotation#3, by @azaroth42.
-
-
8 issues received 34 new comments.
-
Expanded role for agents' activities w3c/web-annotation#7 (6 comments by @azaroth42, @lucmoreau, @paolociccarese, @shepazu)
-
Do we need modules for the specification? w3c/web-annotation#9 (4 comments by @azaroth42, @iherman, @shepazu)
-
Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished? w3c/web-annotation#10 (2 comments by @azaroth42, @lucmoreau)
-
Distinguishing Semantic Tags from Information Resources w3c/web-annotation#4 (1 comment by @iherman)
Participants
-
7 organizations joined.
-
Library of Congress joined.
-
Inria joined.
-
Pearson plc joined.
-
Hachette Livre joined.
-
Book Industry Study Group joined.
-
University of Southampton joined.
-
imec joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/web-annotation
-
2 issues opened.
-
Choice should have a priority order w3c/web-annotation#2, by @azaroth42.
-
Serialization of Lists w3c/web-annotation#1, by @azaroth42.
-
-
1 issue received 2 new comments.
Lifecycle
-
1 charter started.
-
Chartered until 1 October 2016. Participants had to rejoin under this charter.
-
Participants
-
3 participants joined.
-
Antonio Olmo Titos (W3C) joined.
-
Ivan Herman (W3C) joined.
-
Doug Schepers (W3C) joined.
-
-
10 organizations joined.
-
University of Manchester joined.
-
University of Illinois joined.
-
OCLC (Online Computer Library Center, Inc.) joined.
-
JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH joined.
-
Institut Mines-Télécom joined.
-
DAISY Consortium joined.
-
Nokia Corporation joined.
-
MIND Center for Interdisciplinary Informatics joined.
-
Hypothes.is Project joined.
-
Stanford University joined.
-