Verifiable Credentials Working Group - Activity in 2017
No matches.
GitHub
w3c/vc-data-model
-
1 issue opened.
-
Will it be correct to use Verifiable Credentials standard for generic claims? w3c/vc-data-model#100, by @Drabiv.
-
-
3 issues closed.
-
Will it be correct to use Verifiable Credentials standard for generic claims? w3c/vc-data-model#100.
-
RDFS / OWL for VC vocabulary? w3c/vc-data-model#33.
-
"Verifiable Claim" as a concept without a direct data model mapping w3c/vc-data-model#66.
-
-
3 issues received 12 new comments.
-
Privacy implications of loading JSON-LD context w3c/vc-data-model#75 (6 comments by @agropper, @dlongley, @retog)
-
Will it be correct to use Verifiable Credentials standard for generic claims? w3c/vc-data-model#100 (5 comments by @Drabiv, @msporny)
-
"Verifiable Claim" as a concept without a direct data model mapping w3c/vc-data-model#66 (1 comment by @dlongley)
-
-
3 pull requests opened.
-
Fix DID syntax to include "example" method w3c/vc-data-model#102, by @peacekeeper.
-
Add section on Terms of Use. Related to #41 and #48. w3c/vc-data-model#101, by @msporny.
-
Replace revocation with status checking. w3c/vc-data-model#99, by @msporny.
-
-
4 pull requests merged.
-
Fix DID syntax to include "example" method w3c/vc-data-model#102.
-
Add section on Terms of Use. Related to #41 and #48. w3c/vc-data-model#101.
-
Replace revocation with status checking. w3c/vc-data-model#99.
-
Initial commit of vocabulary files. w3c/vc-data-model#96.
-
-
2 pull requests received 11 new comments.
-
Initial commit of vocabulary files. w3c/vc-data-model#96 (10 comments by @dlongley, @gkellogg, @msporny)
-
Participants
-
1 organization joined.
-
GROUPE BPCE joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/vc-data-model
-
4 issues opened.
-
Claim and attestation as two separate concepts w3c/vc-data-model#98, by @davux.
-
Ability to add images in verifiable claims w3c/vc-data-model#97, by @r-soltani.
-
Possible confusions by subject as @id (or RDF subject) w3c/vc-data-model#95, by @cwebber.
-
Proposed resolution to issue about JOSE/JWT Verifiable Claims w3c/vc-data-model#93, by @kimdhamilton.
-
-
11 issues closed.
-
Unsigned claims not secure w3c/vc-data-model#16.
-
Privacy implications of loading JSON-LD context w3c/vc-data-model#75.
-
Possible confusions by subject as @id (or RDF subject) w3c/vc-data-model#95.
-
Origin-bound claims are more privacy-aware w3c/vc-data-model#15.
-
Tokenize to prevent sharing information with the wrong party w3c/vc-data-model#13.
-
Aggregation of claims reveal more than the data itself w3c/vc-data-model#11.
-
Correlatability of bearer claims w3c/vc-data-model#8.
-
Privacy implications of signature or nonce in correlation w3c/vc-data-model#87.
-
Highly dynamic information should have short expiry times w3c/vc-data-model#18.
-
Correlation via frequency of claim issuance w3c/vc-data-model#14.
-
"Inspector-Verifier" terminology is confusing w3c/vc-data-model#64.
-
-
7 issues received 15 new comments.
-
Ability to add images in verifiable claims w3c/vc-data-model#97 (6 comments by @davidlehn, @dlongley, @msporny, @r-soltani)
-
Claim and attestation as two separate concepts w3c/vc-data-model#98 (3 comments by @agropper, @davux)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#42 (2 comments by @dlongley)
-
"Verifiable Claim" as a concept without a direct data model mapping w3c/vc-data-model#66 (1 comment by @dlongley)
-
-
2 pull requests opened.
-
Initial commit of vocabulary files. w3c/vc-data-model#96, by @gkellogg.
-
Fix missing closing bracket in verifiable profile w3c/vc-data-model#94, by @peacekeeper.
-
-
15 pull requests merged.
-
Expand section on validity checks. w3c/vc-data-model#79.
-
Add security section on unsigned credentials. w3c/vc-data-model#88.
-
Add privacy section on long-lived identifiers. Fixes #75. w3c/vc-data-model#90.
-
Fix missing closing bracket in verifiable profile w3c/vc-data-model#94.
-
Add SAML/OIDC comparison by David Chadwick w3c/vc-data-model#74.
-
Add privacy section on single use claims. w3c/vc-data-model#84.
-
Add security section on cryptography suites and libraries. w3c/vc-data-model#86.
-
Add wrong party sharing to privacy section. w3c/vc-data-model#82.
-
Add privacy section on aggregation of claims. w3c/vc-data-model#81.
-
Add "bearer credential" sub-section to privacy analysis section. w3c/vc-data-model#78.
-
Update signature-based correlation section with more bad news. w3c/vc-data-model#91.
-
Add security section on dynamic information. w3c/vc-data-model#89.
-
Add security considerations section summary. w3c/vc-data-model#85.
-
Add section on frequency of claim issuance. w3c/vc-data-model#83.
-
Replace inspector-verifier terminology with Verifier. w3c/vc-data-model#77.
-
-
1 pull request closed.
-
Remove WebIDL from spec text. w3c/vc-data-model#92.
-
-
11 pull requests received 27 new comments.
-
Add "bearer credential" sub-section to privacy analysis section. w3c/vc-data-model#78 (5 comments by @msporny)
-
Fix missing closing bracket in verifiable profile w3c/vc-data-model#94 (3 comments by @msporny, @peacekeeper)
-
Add security section on cryptography suites and libraries. w3c/vc-data-model#86 (1 comment by @msporny)
w3c/vc-test-suite
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Merge preliminary VC test suite into main test suite. w3c/vc-test-suite#1, by @msporny.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Merge preliminary VC test suite into main test suite. w3c/vc-test-suite#1.
-
Participants
-
1 organization left.
-
TPGi left.
-
GitHub
w3c/vc-data-model
-
4 issues opened.
-
Privacy implications of signature or nonce in correlation w3c/vc-data-model#87, by @ChristopherA.
-
On the Ecosystem Overview w3c/vc-data-model#80, by @RieksJ.
-
Define SHACL constraints w3c/vc-data-model#76, by @retog.
-
Privacy implications of loading JSON-LD context w3c/vc-data-model#75, by @retog.
-
-
10 issues closed.
-
An alternate approach to expressing JSON formulations with VC w3c/vc-data-model#27.
-
Why is the Identity Profile not included in the list of "standardization work"? w3c/vc-data-model#25.
-
Confused by json-ld inclusions in JSON examples 3 and 5 -- is this correct? w3c/vc-data-model#23.
-
Typo section 2 "abouth" w3c/vc-data-model#21.
-
Should commenting by adding Github issue be mentioned in Status section? w3c/vc-data-model#20.
-
Dependent claims should be bundled w3c/vc-data-model#17.
-
Proof of Age insufficient for some regulatory requirements w3c/vc-data-model#5.
-
Storage location of claims may mine data w3c/vc-data-model#10.
-
Correlatability of usage patterns w3c/vc-data-model#12.
-
-
25 issues received 70 new comments.
-
Multiple subjects in a single credential w3c/vc-data-model#55 (15 comments by @ChristopherA, @David-Chadwick, @dlongley, @msporny, @RieksJ)
-
Perform security and privacy assessment w3c/vc-data-model#71 (6 comments by @David-Chadwick, @dlongley, @stonematt, @TallTed)
-
"Verifiable Claim" as a concept without a direct data model mapping w3c/vc-data-model#66 (5 comments by @dlongley, @jandrieu, @msporny, @stonematt)
-
Challenges in Understanding Spectrum of Integrity/Inspection/Validation/Verification/Confirmation/Revocation w3c/vc-data-model#59 (5 comments by @dlongley, @kimdhamilton, @msporny, @stonematt)
-
"Inspector-Verifier" terminology is confusing w3c/vc-data-model#64 (3 comments by @ChristopherA, @msporny, @stonematt)
-
How do we support delegation and attenuation of rights? w3c/vc-data-model#72 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#27 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#23 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#21 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#20 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#17 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#5 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#10 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#12 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#41 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
Privacy implications of signature or nonce in correlation w3c/vc-data-model#87 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
-
16 pull requests opened.
-
Remove WebIDL from spec text. w3c/vc-data-model#92, by @msporny.
-
Update signature-based correlation section with more bad news. w3c/vc-data-model#91, by @msporny.
-
Add privacy section on long-lived identifiers. Fixes #75. w3c/vc-data-model#90, by @msporny.
-
Add security section on dynamic information. w3c/vc-data-model#89, by @msporny.
-
Add security section on unsigned credentials. w3c/vc-data-model#88, by @msporny.
-
Add security section on cryptography suites and libraries. w3c/vc-data-model#86, by @msporny.
-
Add security considerations section summary. w3c/vc-data-model#85, by @msporny.
-
Add privacy section on single use claims. w3c/vc-data-model#84, by @msporny.
-
Add section on frequency of claim issuance. w3c/vc-data-model#83, by @msporny.
-
Add wrong party sharing to privacy section. w3c/vc-data-model#82, by @msporny.
-
Add privacy section on aggregation of claims. w3c/vc-data-model#81, by @msporny.
-
Expand section on validity checks. w3c/vc-data-model#79, by @msporny.
-
Add "bearer credential" sub-section to privacy analysis section. w3c/vc-data-model#78, by @msporny.
-
Replace inspector-verifier terminology with Verifier. w3c/vc-data-model#77, by @msporny.
-
Add SAML/OIDC comparison by David Chadwick w3c/vc-data-model#74, by @msporny.
-
Add David Chadwick's privacy analysis document w3c/vc-data-model#73, by @msporny.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Add David Chadwick's privacy analysis document w3c/vc-data-model#73.
-
-
12 pull requests received 44 new comments.
-
Add "bearer credential" sub-section to privacy analysis section. w3c/vc-data-model#78 (9 comments by @burnburn, @David-Chadwick, @dlongley, @msporny)
-
Add SAML/OIDC comparison by David Chadwick w3c/vc-data-model#74 (6 comments by @burnburn, @David-Chadwick, @dlongley, @kimdhamilton, @msporny)
-
Replace inspector-verifier terminology with Verifier. w3c/vc-data-model#77 (6 comments by @dlongley, @jandrieu, @msporny)
-
Add David Chadwick's privacy analysis document w3c/vc-data-model#73 (6 comments by @ChristopherA, @dlongley, @msporny, @retog)
-
Add section on frequency of claim issuance. w3c/vc-data-model#83 (5 comments by @burnburn, @dlongley, @msporny)
-
Add security section on dynamic information. w3c/vc-data-model#89 (2 comments by @burnburn, @dlongley)
-
Update signature-based correlation section with more bad news. w3c/vc-data-model#91 (2 comments by @dlongley, @msporny)
-
Add security considerations section summary. w3c/vc-data-model#85 (2 comments by @dlongley, @msporny)
-
Add security section on cryptography suites and libraries. w3c/vc-data-model#86 (1 comment by @burnburn)
-
w3c/vc-use-cases
-
7 issues opened.
-
Supervised Remote In-Person Identity Proofing w3c/vc-use-cases#53, by @jandrewh.
-
New section: privacy risks w3c/vc-use-cases#52, by @jandrieu.
-
New section: gap analysis w3c/vc-use-cases#51, by @jandrieu.
-
New section - Evidence of applicability w3c/vc-use-cases#50, by @jandrieu.
-
Is storage out of scope? w3c/vc-use-cases#49, by @jandrieu.
-
Add retail use cases w3c/vc-use-cases#48, by @jandrieu.
-
URL in github needs updating w3c/vc-use-cases#47, by @jandrieu.
-
-
2 issues closed.
-
Two minor typos that should be fixed: "knwoing" for "knowing"; "the" for "they" w3c/vc-use-cases#7.
-
“digital credentials that encapsulates” has a singular-plural disagreement w3c/vc-use-cases#8.
-
-
3 issues received 11 new comments.
-
Supervised Remote In-Person Identity Proofing w3c/vc-use-cases#53 (2 comments by @dlongley, @jandrewh)
-
w3c/vc-use-cases#18 (1 comment by @Fak3)
-
3 pull requests merged.
-
Added forgotten verb in sec 5 w3c/vc-use-cases#15.
-
SR-Typos and Joleen singular-plural w3c/vc-use-cases#16.
-
fixing typo w3c/vc-use-cases#45.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/vc-use-cases#17 (1 comment by @jandrieu)
-
Participants
-
2 organizations joined.
-
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) joined.
-
FactsMission joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/vc-data-model
-
2 issues opened.
-
How do we support delegation and attenuation of rights? w3c/vc-data-model#72, by @David-Chadwick.
-
Perform security and privacy assessment w3c/vc-data-model#71, by @dlongley.
-
-
5 issues received 37 new comments.
-
Unstated expectations and assumptions about subject-holder relationships w3c/vc-data-model#68 (29 comments by @agropper, @burnburn, @David-Chadwick, @dlongley, @jandrieu, @msporny)
-
Perform security and privacy assessment w3c/vc-data-model#71 (3 comments by @David-Chadwick, @dlongley)
-
w3c/vc-use-cases
-
1 pull request opened.
-
tiny typo, s/knwoing/knowing/ w3c/vc-use-cases#46, by @sandhawke.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
tiny typo, s/knwoing/knowing/ w3c/vc-use-cases#46.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
w3c/vc-data-integrity
-
2 issues opened.
-
Which options are "input options"? w3c/vc-data-integrity#16, by @cwebber.
-
Specifying that input document must be framed or compacted in algorithm? w3c/vc-data-integrity#20, by @cwebber.
-
-
3 issues received 8 new comments.
-
Specifying that input document must be framed or compacted in algorithm? w3c/vc-data-integrity#20 (3 comments by @cwebber, @msporny)
-
Mentioning how to retrieve the public key w3c/vc-data-integrity#24 (2 comments by @cwebber, @dlongley)
-
TR publications
-
1 document published.
-
Verifiable Claims Data Model and Representations published as a First Public Working Draft. History of Verifiable Claims Data Model and Representations
-
GitHub
w3c/vc-data-integrity
-
1 issue opened.
-
Should the verification algorithm recursively check embedded objects? w3c/vc-data-integrity#21, by @cwebber.
-
-
1 issue received 3 new comments.
-
Should the verification algorithm recursively check embedded objects? w3c/vc-data-integrity#21 (3 comments by @cwebber, @dlongley)
-
w3c/vc-data-model
-
2 issues opened.
-
Holder Bundling of Separate Claims w3c/vc-data-model#70, by @David-Chadwick.
-
Unstated expectations and assumptions about subject-holder relationships w3c/vc-data-model#68, by @jandrieu.
-
-
3 issues received 4 new comments.
-
Unstated expectations and assumptions about subject-holder relationships w3c/vc-data-model#68 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#25 (1 comment by @jandrieu)
-
2 pull requests opened.
-
Add section on bundling dependent claims. w3c/vc-data-model#69, by @msporny.
-
Refactor core data model section w3c/vc-data-model#67, by @msporny.
-
-
3 pull requests merged.
-
Add section on bundling dependent claims. w3c/vc-data-model#69.
-
Refactor core data model section w3c/vc-data-model#67.
-
Restructure spec to describe basic concepts and verification w3c/vc-data-model#65.
-
-
3 pull requests received 32 new comments.
-
Refactor core data model section w3c/vc-data-model#67 (23 comments by @burnburn, @ChristopherA, @dlongley, @jandrieu, @kimdhamilton, @msporny)
-
Add section on bundling dependent claims. w3c/vc-data-model#69 (6 comments by @burnburn, @David-Chadwick, @kimdhamilton, @msporny)
-
Restructure spec to describe basic concepts and verification w3c/vc-data-model#65 (3 comments by @burnburn, @kimdhamilton, @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-use-cases
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/vc-use-cases#18 (1 comment by @jandrieu)
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/vc-use-cases#16 (1 comment by @jandrieu)
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
David Chadwick (W3C Invited Experts) joined.
-
-
1 organization joined.
-
Learning Machine, Inc. joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/vc-data-model
-
8 issues opened.
-
"Verifiable Claim" as a concept without a direct data model mapping w3c/vc-data-model#66, by @dlongley.
-
"Inspector-Verifier" terminology is confusing w3c/vc-data-model#64, by @msporny.
-
Insight for DID spec: proofs, not keys w3c/vc-data-model#62, by @kimdhamilton.
-
DID Documents as self-signed Verifiable Claims w3c/vc-data-model#61, by @kimdhamilton.
-
What would a counter-signed RWoT claim look like? w3c/vc-data-model#60, by @kimdhamilton.
-
Expiration versus Revocation w3c/vc-data-model#58, by @rvarn.
-
Ideas for roles to add to the data model for next draft w3c/vc-data-model#57, by @rvarn.
-
-
2 issues closed.
-
List all validity checks that should be performed w3c/vc-data-model#9.
-
Insight for DID spec: proofs, not keys w3c/vc-data-model#62.
-
-
8 issues received 42 new comments.
-
"Verifiable Claim" as a concept without a direct data model mapping w3c/vc-data-model#66 (11 comments by @burdges, @dlongley, @jandrieu, @msporny)
-
Challenges in Understanding Spectrum of Integrity/Inspection/Validation/Verification/Confirmation/Revocation w3c/vc-data-model#59 (9 comments by @kimdhamilton)
-
Insight for DID spec: proofs, not keys w3c/vc-data-model#62 (8 comments by @agropper, @kimdhamilton)
-
DID Documents as self-signed Verifiable Claims w3c/vc-data-model#61 (4 comments by @dlongley, @kimdhamilton)
-
"Inspector-Verifier" terminology is confusing w3c/vc-data-model#64 (2 comments by @msporny, @stonematt)
-
What would a counter-signed RWoT claim look like? w3c/vc-data-model#60 (2 comments by @kimdhamilton, @msporny)
-
-
2 pull requests opened.
-
Restructure spec to describe basic concepts and verification w3c/vc-data-model#65, by @msporny.
-
Fix GitHub link (issues, etc): vc-use-cases -> vc-data-model w3c/vc-data-model#63, by @cwebber.
-
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
Fix GitHub link (issues, etc): vc-use-cases -> vc-data-model w3c/vc-data-model#63.
-
A moderate rework of the introductory text and images w3c/vc-data-model#56.
-
-
2 pull requests received 4 new comments.
-
Restructure spec to describe basic concepts and verification w3c/vc-data-model#65 (3 comments by @ChristopherA, @dlongley, @stonematt)
-
Fix GitHub link (issues, etc): vc-use-cases -> vc-data-model w3c/vc-data-model#63 (1 comment by @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-integrity
-
1 issue opened.
-
Storing information on whether a child object is referenced by id or included recursively w3c/vc-data-integrity#22, by @cwebber.
-
-
1 issue received 4 new comments.
-
Storing information on whether a child object is referenced by id or included recursively w3c/vc-data-integrity#22 (4 comments by @cwebber, @msporny)
-
TR publications
-
1 document published.
-
Verifiable Claims Use Cases published as a Note. History of Verifiable Claims Use Cases
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Andrei Sambra (AKASHA Foundation) joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/vc-data-model
-
5 issues opened.
-
Multiple subjects in a single credential w3c/vc-data-model#55, by @msporny.
-
Should spec include WebIDL and XML expressions w3c/vc-data-model#54, by @msporny.
-
Repo Needs README.md w3c/vc-data-model#52, by @ChristopherA.
-
Bad Github Description Link w3c/vc-data-model#51, by @ChristopherA.
-
Add Accessibility Use Case for under 3.3 Healthcare w3c/vc-data-model#50, by @Ryladog.
-
-
3 issues closed.
-
Repo Needs README.md w3c/vc-data-model#52.
-
Bad Github Description Link w3c/vc-data-model#51.
-
Atomize information for principle of least authority w3c/vc-data-model#7.
-
-
9 issues received 11 new comments.
-
w3c/vc-data-model#33 (1 comment by @ghost)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#27 (1 comment by @BigBlueHat)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#23 (1 comment by @BigBlueHat)
-
3 pull requests opened.
-
A moderate rework of the introductory text and images w3c/vc-data-model#56, by @msporny.
-
Update head-matter to be consistent with vc-use-cases. w3c/vc-data-model#53, by @gkellogg.
-
Refactor some uses of "identity" to "entity". w3c/vc-data-model#49, by @msporny.
-
-
3 pull requests merged.
-
Refactor some uses of "identity" to "entity". w3c/vc-data-model#49.
-
Comment out WebIDL section w3c/vc-data-model#45.
-
Add content to Principle of Minimum Disclosure section. w3c/vc-data-model#38.
-
-
4 pull requests closed.
-
Update head-matter to be consistent with vc-use-cases. w3c/vc-data-model#53.
-
Add comment about updating a paragraph (DO NOT MERGE) w3c/vc-data-model#31.
-
Add ignore me comment (DO NOT MERGE) w3c/vc-data-model#28.
-
Add links and references to missing terminology. w3c/vc-data-model#40.
-
-
4 pull requests received 106 new comments.
-
A moderate rework of the introductory text and images w3c/vc-data-model#56 (66 comments by @agropper, @ChristopherA, @ckennedy422, @David-Chadwick, @dezell, @dlongley, @ghost, @jandrieu, @msporny, @rvarn, @stonematt, @talltree)
-
Refactor some uses of "identity" to "entity". w3c/vc-data-model#49 (25 comments by @burnburn, @dlongley, @jandrieu, @msporny, @stonematt)
-
Update head-matter to be consistent with vc-use-cases. w3c/vc-data-model#53 (12 comments by @burnburn, @gkellogg, @liamquin, @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-use-cases
-
1 issue opened.
-
VC use cases - "Dispute" User task w3c/vc-use-cases#42, by @riannella.
-
-
3 pull requests opened.
-
fixing typo w3c/vc-use-cases#45, by @dret.
-
Change mailing list to public-vc-comments@w3.org ... w3c/vc-use-cases#44, by @gkellogg.
-
Change from FPWD to Note w3c/vc-use-cases#43, by @gkellogg.
-
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
Change mailing list to public-vc-comments@w3.org ... w3c/vc-use-cases#44.
-
Change from FPWD to Note w3c/vc-use-cases#43.
-
-
1 pull request received 5 new comments.
-
Change mailing list to public-vc-comments@w3.org ... w3c/vc-use-cases#44 (5 comments by @burnburn, @gkellogg, @liamquin)
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Daniel Burnett (W3C Invited Experts) joined.
-
-
3 organizations joined.
-
Educational Testing Service joined.
-
Accreditrust Technologies, LLC joined.
-
Knowbility joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/vc-use-cases
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Snapshot for FPWD. w3c/vc-use-cases#41, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Snapshot for FPWD. w3c/vc-use-cases#41.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
w3c/vc-data-model
-
3 issues opened.
-
Add section about terms of use w3c/vc-data-model#48, by @jandrieu.
-
3 Types of Claims w3c/vc-data-model#47, by @ChristopherA.
-
Add section/language about presentation of claims w3c/vc-data-model#46, by @jandrieu.
-
-
3 issues received 4 new comments.
-
w3c/vc-data-model#27 (1 comment by @cwebber)
-
w3c/vc-data-model#42 (1 comment by @dlongley)
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Comment out WebIDL section w3c/vc-data-model#45, by @msporny.
-
-
2 pull requests received 2 new comments.
-
w3c/vc-data-model#38 (1 comment by @jandrieu)
w3c/vc-data-integrity
-
1 issue opened.
-
Missing "created" invalidates signature? w3c/vc-data-integrity#23, by @cyberphone.
-
-
1 issue received 6 new comments.
-
Missing "created" invalidates signature? w3c/vc-data-integrity#23 (6 comments by @ChristopherA, @cyberphone, @mattcollier, @msporny)
-
Lifecycle
-
1 charter started.
-
Chartered until 31 March 2019. Participants had to rejoin under this charter.
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Liam Quin (W3C) joined.
-
-
18 organizations joined.
-
Conexxus joined.
-
Evernym joined.
-
Department of Information Technology, Government of India joined.
-
Inria joined.
-
Australian National University joined.
-
HM Government joined.
-
Ethereum Foundation joined.
-
Info Tech, Inc. joined.
-
OpenLink Software Inc. joined.
-
The Open University joined.
-
Blockstream joined.
-
CANTON CONSULTING joined.
-
Pearson plc joined.
-
Wiley joined.
-
TPGi joined.
-
Spec-Ops joined.
-
Digital Bazaar joined.
-
VitalSource | Ingram Content Group joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/vc-data-integrity
-
1 issue opened.
-
Mentioning how to retrieve the public key w3c/vc-data-integrity#24, by @cwebber.
-
-
1 issue received 2 new comments.
-
Mentioning how to retrieve the public key w3c/vc-data-integrity#24 (2 comments by @dlongley, @msporny)
-
w3c/vc-data-model
-
1 issue closed.
-
Favoring abstract claims w3c/vc-data-model#6.
-
-
3 pull requests merged.
-
Adds description of Favoring Abstract Claims w3c/vc-data-model#43.
-
Expanded section on correlatable usage patterns w3c/vc-data-model#37.
-
Add verification check instructions. Relates to #9. w3c/vc-data-model#44.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/vc-data-model#38 (1 comment by @msporny)
-