JSON-LD Working Group - Activity in 2021
No matches.
GitHub
w3c/json-ld-syntax
-
1 issue opened.
-
would it be possible to reserve @view for JSON-LD v.next w3c/json-ld-syntax#384, by @melvincarvalho.
-
-
1 issue received 8 new comments.
-
would it be possible to reserve @view for JSON-LD v.next w3c/json-ld-syntax#384 (8 comments by @gkellogg, @melvincarvalho, @Peeja, @TallTed)
-
json-ld/json-ld-star
-
2 issues opened.
-
allow `"@type": "@triple"` or something similar? json-ld/json-ld-star#28, by @pchampin.
-
allow `"@annotation": "<IRI>"` in term definition json-ld/json-ld-star#27, by @pchampin.
-
-
2 issues received 7 new comments.
-
allow `"@type": "@triple"` or something similar? json-ld/json-ld-star#28 (2 comments by @gkellogg, @pchampin)
-
1 pull request opened.
-
fix description of `@reverse` with annotation nodes json-ld/json-ld-star#26, by @pchampin.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
fix description of `@reverse` with annotation nodes json-ld/json-ld-star#26.
-
GitHub
w3c/json-ld-syntax
-
1 issue opened.
-
creating new vocabulary terms section 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 w3c/json-ld-syntax#383, by @bertvannuffelen.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Section B.3 of microdata has no example of original content reference w3c/json-ld-syntax#382.
-
-
2 issues received 2 new comments.
-
creating new vocabulary terms section 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 w3c/json-ld-syntax#383 (1 comment by @gkellogg)
-
Section B.3 of microdata has no example of original content reference w3c/json-ld-syntax#382 (1 comment by @ppKrauss)
-
w3c/json-ld-framing
-
1 issue opened.
-
Language map with global context w3c/json-ld-framing#126, by @Murloc6.
-
Participants
-
1 organization left.
-
University of Oxford left.
-
GitHub
w3c/json-ld-syntax
-
1 issue opened.
-
Section B.3 of microdata has no example of original content reference w3c/json-ld-syntax#382, by @ppKrauss.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Question: What is the difference between @context and @type w3c/json-ld-syntax#381.
-
-
2 issues received 7 new comments.
-
Section B.3 of microdata has no example of original content reference w3c/json-ld-syntax#382 (6 comments by @gkellogg, @pchampin, @ppKrauss)
-
Question: What is the difference between @context and @type w3c/json-ld-syntax#381 (1 comment by @lambdakris)
-
w3c/json-ld-bp
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
w3c/json-ld-api
-
1 issue opened.
-
What to do with value entries outside value objects? w3c/json-ld-api#535, by @timothee-haudebourg.
-
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
json-ld/json-ld-star
-
1 issue received 2 new comments.
GitHub
json-ld/json-ld-star
-
1 issue opened.
-
Using `@annotation` on a `@type` json-ld/json-ld-star#24, by @niklasl.
-
-
1 issue received 6 new comments.
-
Using `@annotation` on a `@type` json-ld/json-ld-star#24 (6 comments by @gkellogg, @niklasl, @pchampin, @Peeja)
-
w3c/json-ld-syntax
-
2 issues opened.
-
Question: What is the difference between @context and @type w3c/json-ld-syntax#381, by @lambdakris.
-
Playground does not match the specifications w3c/json-ld-syntax#379, by @SvenPVoigt.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Playground does not match the specifications w3c/json-ld-syntax#379.
-
-
4 issues received 9 new comments.
-
Playground does not match the specifications w3c/json-ld-syntax#379 (5 comments by @gkellogg, @SvenPVoigt)
-
Make it easier to keep semantics of object-oriented models w3c/json-ld-syntax#376 (2 comments by @about-code, @TallTed)
-
Question: What is the difference between @context and @type w3c/json-ld-syntax#381 (1 comment by @pchampin)
-
Is the value space of rdf:JSON and xsd:boolean disjoint? w3c/json-ld-syntax#323 (1 comment by @twistos)
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/json-ld-syntax#380 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/json-ld-rc
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Use ruby/setup-ruby@v1 and update Gemfile.lock. w3c/json-ld-rc#19, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Use ruby/setup-ruby@v1 and update Gemfile.lock. w3c/json-ld-rc#19.
-
w3c/json-ld-api
-
3 issues received 9 new comments.
-
Invalid '@base' IRI is accepted by the context processing algorithm in deserialization test suite. w3c/json-ld-api#533 (4 comments by @gkellogg, @timothee-haudebourg)
-
Invalid IRIs in compaction test #tp004 w3c/json-ld-api#517 (3 comments by @gkellogg, @timothee-haudebourg)
-
Is the possibility of having `@id: null` in an expanded document intended? w3c/json-ld-api#480 (2 comments by @gkellogg, @timothee-haudebourg)
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/json-ld-api#534 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/json-ld-framing
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/json-ld-framing#125 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/cbor-ld
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Add DCC context. w3c/cbor-ld#9, by @dmitrizagidulin.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Add DCC context. w3c/cbor-ld#9.
-
GitHub
w3c/json-ld-api
-
1 issue opened.
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
-
Invalid '@base' IRI is accepted by the context processing algorithm in deserialization test suite. w3c/json-ld-api#533 (1 comment by @gkellogg)
-
w3c/json-ld-framing
-
1 issue opened.
-
validation errors/warnings w3c/json-ld-framing#124, by @xueyuanjia.
-
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
GitHub
w3c/json-ld-syntax
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Fix playground references w3c/json-ld-syntax#378, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Fix playground references w3c/json-ld-syntax#378.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/json-ld-syntax#377 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/json-ld-framing
-
2 issues opened.
-
Use a property several time when framing w3c/json-ld-framing#122, by @Murloc6.
-
Possible typos w3c/json-ld-framing#121, by @shujikamitsuna.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Possible typos w3c/json-ld-framing#121.
-
-
2 issues received 3 new comments.
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Editorial updates w3c/json-ld-framing#123, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Editorial updates w3c/json-ld-framing#123.
-
-
2 pull requests received 3 new comments.
-
w3c/json-ld-framing#120 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
w3c/json-ld-api
-
1 issue opened.
-
Reordered test by id w3c/json-ld-api#532, by @davidlehn.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Reordered test by id w3c/json-ld-api#532.
-
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
-
2 pull requests received 2 new comments.
-
w3c/json-ld-api#531 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
json-ld/minutes
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Remove unused dependencies. json-ld/minutes#7, by @davidlehn.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Remove unused dependencies. json-ld/minutes#7.
-
w3c/json-ld-bp
-
1 issue opened.
-
Recommendation for included objects? w3c/json-ld-bp#35, by @davidbarratt.
-
-
1 issue received 3 new comments.
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Disable link checker and update gem versions. w3c/json-ld-bp#34, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Disable link checker and update gem versions. w3c/json-ld-bp#34.
-
json-ld/json-ld-star
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Set respec config to use "main" branch. json-ld/json-ld-star#23, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Set respec config to use "main" branch. json-ld/json-ld-star#23.
-
Participants
-
1 Team contact appointed.
-
Philippe Le Hegaret became a Team contact.
-
-
1 Team contact stepped down.
-
Ivan Herman stepped down as a Team contact.
-
-
1 participant joined.
-
Philippe Le Hegaret (W3C) joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
Ivan Herman (W3C) left.
-
GitHub
w3c/json-ld-syntax
-
1 issue opened.
-
Make it easier to keep semantics of object-oriented models w3c/json-ld-syntax#376, by @about-code.
-
-
1 issue received 2 new comments.
-
Make it easier to keep semantics of object-oriented models w3c/json-ld-syntax#376 (2 comments by @about-code, @pchampin)
-
w3c/json-ld-framing
-
1 issue opened.
-
Can frames produce id maps? w3c/json-ld-framing#119, by @rybesh.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Can frames produce id maps? w3c/json-ld-framing#119.
-
-
1 issue received 2 new comments.
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Michael Prorock (Tradeverifyd) joined.
-
-
1 organization joined.
-
Tradeverifyd joined.
-
GitHub
w3c/json-ld-framing
-
2 issues opened.
-
Pattern Matching w3c/json-ld-framing#118, by @AtesComp.
-
Ex. 41 Playground doesn't contain `@omitGraph: false` + playground does not apply `@omitGraph` w3c/json-ld-framing#116, by @kuzdogan.
-
-
2 issues received 6 new comments.
-
Ex. 41 Playground doesn't contain `@omitGraph: false` + playground does not apply `@omitGraph` w3c/json-ld-framing#116 (2 comments by @gkellogg)
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/json-ld-framing#117 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/json-ld-syntax
-
1 issue closed.
-
relative w3c/json-ld-syntax#375.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/json-ld-syntax#374 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/json-ld-bp
-
1 issue opened.
-
Extra framing and validation information for extension w3c/json-ld-bp#37, by @sebastiankb.
-
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
json-ld/json-ld-star
-
1 issue opened.
-
Expansion Algorithm: step 13.4.14 json-ld/json-ld-star#20, by @filip26.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Expansion Algorithm: step 13.4.14 json-ld/json-ld-star#20.
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Make sure result of expanding `@annotation` is an array. json-ld/json-ld-star#21, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Make sure result of expanding `@annotation` is an array. json-ld/json-ld-star#21.
-
w3c/cbor-ld
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Add VC Revocation List 2020 term codec value. w3c/cbor-ld#8.
-
w3c/json-ld-api
-
1 issue closed.
-
No roundtrip with property-based data indexing w3c/json-ld-api#514.
-
-
1 issue received 4 new comments.
-
No roundtrip with property-based data indexing w3c/json-ld-api#514 (4 comments by @gkellogg, @vcharpenay)
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Fix compacting property-based indexes. w3c/json-ld-api#528, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Fix compacting property-based indexes. w3c/json-ld-api#528.
-
-
2 pull requests received 3 new comments.
-
w3c/json-ld-api#529 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
GitHub
w3c/json-ld-framing
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/json-ld-framing#115 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/json-ld-api
-
1 issue opened.
-
Define a top-level @container as @type? w3c/json-ld-api#526, by @davidbarratt.
-
-
3 issues closed.
-
References and side effects in compaction algorithm w3c/json-ld-api#510.
-
IRI compaction must not generate keyword-like relative IRIs w3c/json-ld-api#524.
-
Define a top-level @container as @type? w3c/json-ld-api#526.
-
-
3 issues received 4 new comments.
-
Define a top-level @container as @type? w3c/json-ld-api#526 (2 comments by @davidbarratt, @gkellogg)
-
IRI compaction must not generate keyword-like relative IRIs w3c/json-ld-api#524 (1 comment by @gkellogg)
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Clarification and test-case about compacting keyword-like relative IRIs w3c/json-ld-api#525.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/json-ld-api#527 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/json-ld-syntax
-
1 issue opened.
-
Support multiple IRIs for `@reverse` w3c/json-ld-syntax#372, by @alexkreidler.
-
-
1 issue received 5 new comments.
-
Support multiple IRIs for `@reverse` w3c/json-ld-syntax#372 (5 comments by @alexkreidler, @gkellogg, @pchampin)
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Add a note on the change from HTTP document to HTML document. w3c/json-ld-syntax#371, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Add a note on the change from HTTP document to HTML document. w3c/json-ld-syntax#371.
-
-
2 pull requests received 2 new comments.
-
w3c/json-ld-syntax#373 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
Add a note on the change from HTTP document to HTML document. w3c/json-ld-syntax#371 (1 comment by @gkellogg)
-
w3c/cbor-ld
-
4 pull requests opened.
-
Add VC Revocation List 2020 term codec value. w3c/cbor-ld#8, by @dmitrizagidulin.
-
Register new contexts, fix ed25519 context links. w3c/cbor-ld#6, by @dmitrizagidulin.
-
Register codec term for Veres One DID Method context. w3c/cbor-ld#5, by @dmitrizagidulin.
-
-
3 pull requests merged.
-
Register new contexts, fix ed25519 context links. w3c/cbor-ld#6.
-
Register codec term for Veres One DID Method context. w3c/cbor-ld#5.
-
1 pull request received 2 new comments.
Participants
-
1 participant left.
-
Clément Warnier de Wailly (CANTON CONSULTING) left.
-
GitHub
w3c/json-ld-syntax
-
2 issues opened.
-
"HTTP document" w3c/json-ld-syntax#369, by @pchampin.
-
Typo "it it" w3c/json-ld-syntax#368, by @EdgarSchouten.
-
-
2 issues closed.
-
"HTTP document" w3c/json-ld-syntax#369.
-
Typo "it it" w3c/json-ld-syntax#368.
-
-
2 issues received 7 new comments.
-
1 pull request merged.
-
fix #369 w3c/json-ld-syntax#370.
-
w3c/cbor-ld
-
2 pull requests opened.
-
Add X25519KeyAgreementKey2020 context. w3c/cbor-ld#4, by @dmitrizagidulin.
-
Add registered terms codecs table. w3c/cbor-ld#3, by @dmitrizagidulin.
-
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
Add X25519KeyAgreementKey2020 context. w3c/cbor-ld#4.
-
Add registered terms codecs table. w3c/cbor-ld#3.
-
-
1 pull request received 11 new comments.
-
Add registered terms codecs table. w3c/cbor-ld#3 (11 comments by @davidlehn, @dlongley, @dmitrizagidulin, @msporny)
-
w3c/json-ld-bp
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Respec ci updates w3c/json-ld-bp#30, by @gkellogg.
-
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
Respec ci updates w3c/json-ld-bp#30.
-
Minor editorial thingies w3c/json-ld-bp#25.
-
-
1 pull request received 6 new comments.
json-ld/json-ld-star
-
1 issue opened.
-
Make `rdfstar` an multiple-choice option rather than a flag json-ld/json-ld-star#15, by @pchampin.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Make `rdfstar` an multiple-choice option rather than a flag json-ld/json-ld-star#15.
-
-
1 issue received 7 new comments.
-
Make `rdfstar` an multiple-choice option rather than a flag json-ld/json-ld-star#15 (7 comments by @gkellogg, @pchampin)
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Update ReSpec action json-ld/json-ld-star#16, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Update ReSpec action json-ld/json-ld-star#16.
-
GitHub
w3c/json-ld-api
-
1 issue opened.
-
IRI compaction must not generate keyword-like relative IRIs w3c/json-ld-api#524, by @pchampin.
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Clarification and test-case about compacting keyword-like relative IRIs w3c/json-ld-api#525, by @pchampin.
-
-
1 pull request received 2 new comments.
-
Clarification and test-case about compacting keyword-like relative IRIs w3c/json-ld-api#525 (2 comments by @gkellogg, @pchampin)
-
json-ld/json-ld-star
-
2 issues closed.
-
Allow annotations on list object json-ld/json-ld-star#10.
-
RDF to JSON should use @annotation, where possible json-ld/json-ld-star#11.
-
-
2 issues received 9 new comments.
-
RDF to JSON should use @annotation, where possible json-ld/json-ld-star#11 (5 comments by @gkellogg, @pchampin)
-
-
2 pull requests opened.
-
Align with updated RDF-star spec json-ld/json-ld-star#14, by @gkellogg.
-
Flattened annotations json-ld/json-ld-star#13, by @gkellogg.
-
-
3 pull requests merged.
-
Align with updated RDF-star spec json-ld/json-ld-star#14.
-
Flattened annotations json-ld/json-ld-star#13.
-
Embed algorithms json-ld/json-ld-star#9.
-
-
1 pull request received 9 new comments.
GitHub
json-ld/json-ld-star
-
3 issues opened.
-
RDF to JSON should use @annotation, where possible json-ld/json-ld-star#11, by @gkellogg.
-
Allow annotations on list object json-ld/json-ld-star#10, by @gkellogg.
-
Figure out restrictReferences on terms json-ld/json-ld-star#8, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Figure out restrictReferences on terms json-ld/json-ld-star#8.
-
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Embed algorithms json-ld/json-ld-star#9, by @gkellogg.
-
-
1 pull request received 51 new comments.
w3c/json-ld-api
-
1 issue closed.
-
Handling active subject in node map generation w3c/json-ld-api#519.
-
-
1 issue received 10 new comments.
-
Handling active subject in node map generation w3c/json-ld-api#519 (10 comments by @clehner, @gkellogg, @iherman, @pchampin)
-
-
2 pull requests opened.
-
address issue #519 w3c/json-ld-api#520, by @pchampin.
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
Fix link w3c/json-ld-api#523.
-
address issue #519 w3c/json-ld-api#520.
-
-
4 pull requests received 8 new comments.
-
w3c/json-ld-api#522 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/json-ld-api#521 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
w3c/json-ld-bp
-
1 issue opened.
-
Expand section on "Serializing Large Datasets" w3c/json-ld-bp#29, by @gkellogg.
-
w3c/json-ld-syntax
-
1 issue opened.
-
Request for guidance for parsing larger JSON-LD data files w3c/json-ld-syntax#366, by @wouterbeek.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Request for guidance for parsing larger JSON-LD data files w3c/json-ld-syntax#366.
-
-
1 issue received 3 new comments.
-
Request for guidance for parsing larger JSON-LD data files w3c/json-ld-syntax#366 (3 comments by @gkellogg, @rubensworks, @wouterbeek)
-
w3c/json-ld-framing
-
2 pull requests received 2 new comments.
-
w3c/json-ld-framing#114 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/json-ld-framing#113 (1 comment by @w3cbot)
-
w3c/json-ld-streaming
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
w3c/json-ld-streaming#23 (1 comment by @gkellogg)
-