TREE hypermedia Community Group - Activity in 2025
No matches.
GitHub
TREEcg/specification
-
1 issue opened.
-
Support for 2D and 3D Cartesian coordinate systems (non-geospatial data) TREEcg/specification#155, by @ebremer.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Clarify tree:ConditionalImport, tree:import and tree:conditionalImport ? TREEcg/specification#152.
-
-
2 issues received 3 new comments.
-
TREE relations vs. SHACL constraint components TREEcg/specification#115 (2 comments by @bergos, @xdxxxdx)
-
Support for 2D and 3D Cartesian coordinate systems (non-geospatial data) TREEcg/specification#155 (1 comment by @pietercolpaert)
-
-
1 pull request closed.
-
Tests cases specification TREEcg/specification#120.
-
-
2 pull requests received 2 new comments.
Participants
-
1 participant left.
-
Alex Wied left.
-
GitHub
TREEcg/specification
-
1 pull request received 7 new comments.
-
PR for latest progresses on testing spec TREEcg/specification#154 (7 comments by @pietercolpaert, @xdxxxdx)
-
GitHub
TREEcg/specification
-
1 pull request opened.
-
PR for latest progresses on testing spec TREEcg/specification#154, by @xdxxxdx.
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Alex Wied joined.
-
GitHub
TREEcg/specification
-
1 pull request opened.
-
fix; merge the update of the main branch TREEcg/specification#153, by @xdxxxdx.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
fix; merge the update of the main branch TREEcg/specification#153.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
GitHub
TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape
-
1 issue opened.
-
Support for iterative fetching of quads via SPARQL TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape#42, by @danielbeeke.
-
TREEcg/specification
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
-
Clarify tree:ConditionalImport, tree:import and tree:conditionalImport ? TREEcg/specification#152 (1 comment by @pietercolpaert)
-
GitHub
TREEcg/specification
-
5 issues opened.
-
Clarify tree:ConditionalImport, tree:import and tree:conditionalImport ? TREEcg/specification#152, by @rorlic.
-
Wrong namespace for subClassOf TREEcg/specification#151, by @rorlic.
-
Does a `tree:shape` define a shape that members MAY or MUST adhere to? TREEcg/specification#150, by @rorlic.
-
Clarify time searching? TREEcg/specification#149, by @rorlic.
-
Comparing timestamps without timezone indication TREEcg/specification#148, by @rorlic.
-
GitHub
TREEcg/site
-
1 pull request closed.
-
chore: added step-by-step guide as a series of blogs TREEcg/site#15.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
TREEcg/specification
-
1 issue opened.
-
Multiple descriptions MUST be combined TREEcg/specification#146, by @xdxxxdx.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Revisiting the initialization section TREEcg/specification#137.
-
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
-
4 pull requests opened.
-
Few markdown fixes TREEcg/specification#147, by @xdxxxdx.
-
Continuation: Clarity on comparing named nodes, strings and time literals TREEcg/specification#145, by @constraintAutomaton.
-
Fix for #137: rewriting the initialization section TREEcg/specification#144, by @pietercolpaert.
-
Fix #139: Member extraction algorithm TREEcg/specification#143, by @pietercolpaert.
-
-
5 pull requests merged.
-
Few markdown fixes TREEcg/specification#147.
-
Clarity on comparing named nodes, strings and time literals TREEcg/specification#134.
-
Fix for #137: rewriting the initialization section TREEcg/specification#144.
-
Continuation: Clarity on comparing named nodes, strings and time literals TREEcg/specification#145.
-
feat: update test specification TREEcg/specification#142.
-
-
4 pull requests received 30 new comments.
-
Fix #139: Member extraction algorithm TREEcg/specification#143 (12 comments by @pietercolpaert, @smessie)
-
Clarity on comparing named nodes, strings and time literals TREEcg/specification#134 (9 comments by @constraintAutomaton, @pietercolpaert)
-
Fix for #137: rewriting the initialization section TREEcg/specification#144 (7 comments by @pietercolpaert, @smessie, @xdxxxdx)
-
GitHub
TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape
-
1 issue opened.
-
Mermaid diagrams are not rendered properly TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape#40, by @julianrojas87.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Mermaid diagrams are not rendered properly TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape#40.
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Fix #40 + other minor improvements TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape#41, by @julianrojas87.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Fix #40 + other minor improvements TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape#41.
-
TREEcg/specification
-
1 issue closed.
-
Profile for efficient and streaming parsing TREEcg/specification#118.
-
-
4 issues received 6 new comments.
-
Revisiting the member extraction algorithm (MEA) section TREEcg/specification#139 (2 comments by @pietercolpaert, @smessie)
-
TREE relations vs. SHACL constraint components TREEcg/specification#115 (2 comments by @ajuvercr, @xdxxxdx)
-
Member extraction algorithm: supporting multiple named graphs in one member TREEcg/specification#113 (1 comment by @pietercolpaert)
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
feat: update test specification TREEcg/specification#142, by @xdxxxdx.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
The TREE profile spec TREEcg/specification#125.
-
-
3 pull requests received 16 new comments.
-
The TREE profile spec TREEcg/specification#125 (11 comments by @ajuvercr, @pietercolpaert, @smessie)
-
Clarity on comparing named nodes, strings and time literals TREEcg/specification#134 (4 comments by @pietercolpaert, @smessie)
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Ruben Dedecker (Ghent University) joined.
-
GitHub
TREEcg/specification
-
10 issues opened.
-
SHACL shapes for validating TREE servers TREEcg/specification#141, by @pietercolpaert.
-
Add a link to the TREE ontology in the specification? TREEcg/specification#140, by @rorlic.
-
Revisiting the member extraction algorithm (MEA) section TREEcg/specification#139, by @pietercolpaert.
-
Making available historic versions of the spec TREEcg/specification#138, by @pietercolpaert.
-
Revisiting the initialization section TREEcg/specification#137, by @pietercolpaert.
-
Relations: a list of datatypes that must be supported? TREEcg/specification#135, by @pietercolpaert.
-
Proposal: `tree:defaultTimezone` for non time zoned `xsd:dateTime` literals TREEcg/specification#133, by @pietercolpaert.
-
The tree:view definition is inconsistent in the spec TREEcg/specification#131, by @pietercolpaert.
-
Clarifying Triple Materialization in TREE Specifications TREEcg/specification#129, by @constraintAutomaton.
-
-
4 issues closed.
-
The tree:view definition is inconsistent in the spec TREEcg/specification#131.
-
Defining the tree:relation in terms of SPARQL algebra TREEcg/specification#116.
-
Clarifying Triple Materialization in TREE Specifications TREEcg/specification#129.
-
-
1 issue reopened.
-
Clear out tree:shape definition TREEcg/specification#75, by @pietercolpaert.
-
-
5 issues received 6 new comments.
-
The InBetween relation for xsd year, month, etc. TREEcg/specification#114 (1 comment by @pietercolpaert)
-
Initialization: should the client support a URL after redirects, and perchance even intermediary URLs while redirecting, for the collection? TREEcg/specification#130 (1 comment by @smessie)
-
Clarifying Triple Materialization in TREE Specifications TREEcg/specification#129 (1 comment by @constraintAutomaton)
-
3 pull requests opened.
-
Update the building command for the spec TREEcg/specification#136, by @constraintAutomaton.
-
Clarity on comparing named nodes, strings and time literals TREEcg/specification#134, by @pietercolpaert.
-
Fix inconsistency in explanation of tree:view TREEcg/specification#132, by @pietercolpaert.
-
-
3 pull requests merged.
-
Update the building command for the spec TREEcg/specification#136.
-
Fix inconsistency in explanation of tree:view TREEcg/specification#132.
-
Defining Tree relations in terms of SPARQL algebra TREEcg/specification#126.
-
-
1 pull request closed.
-
Update wording to improve clarity on tree:view TREEcg/specification#123.
-
-
6 pull requests received 41 new comments.
-
Clarity on comparing named nodes, strings and time literals TREEcg/specification#134 (9 comments by @constraintAutomaton, @pietercolpaert)
-
Update wording to improve clarity on tree:view TREEcg/specification#123 (9 comments by @pietercolpaert, @smessie)
-
Defining Tree relations in terms of SPARQL algebra TREEcg/specification#126 (9 comments by @constraintAutomaton, @pietercolpaert)
-
Fix inconsistency in explanation of tree:view TREEcg/specification#132 (6 comments by @pietercolpaert, @smessie)
-
TREEcg/site
-
1 pull request opened.
-
chore: added step-by-step guide as a series of blogs TREEcg/site#15, by @rorlic.
-
Participants
-
2 participants joined.
-
Dwight Van Lancker joined.
-
Jo Delaure (Redpencil BV) joined.
-
-
1 organization joined.
-
Redpencil BV joined.
-
GitHub
TREEcg/specification
-
2 issues opened.
-
Can a tree:Collection contain only one type of thing? TREEcg/specification#128, by @rorlic.
-
Not every tree:Node you are currently viewing is a tree:view TREEcg/specification#127, by @rorlic.
-
-
4 issues closed.
-
Can a tree:Collection contain only one type of thing? TREEcg/specification#128.
-
Not every tree:Node you are currently viewing is a tree:view TREEcg/specification#127.
-
Class tree:View is undefined in the TREE vocabulary TREEcg/specification#121.
-
Class tree:ViewDescription is undefined in the TREE vocabulary TREEcg/specification#122.
-
-
6 issues received 7 new comments.
-
Defining the tree:relation in terms of SPARQL algebra TREEcg/specification#116 (2 comments by @constraintAutomaton, @pietercolpaert)
-
Can a tree:Collection contain only one type of thing? TREEcg/specification#128 (1 comment by @pietercolpaert)
-
Not every tree:Node you are currently viewing is a tree:view TREEcg/specification#127 (1 comment by @rorlic)
-
Member extraction algorithm: supporting multiple named graphs in one member TREEcg/specification#113 (1 comment by @pietercolpaert)
-
Class tree:View is undefined in the TREE vocabulary TREEcg/specification#121 (1 comment by @pietercolpaert)
-
Class tree:ViewDescription is undefined in the TREE vocabulary TREEcg/specification#122 (1 comment by @pietercolpaert)
-
-
2 pull requests opened.
-
Defining Tree relations in terms of SPARQL algebra TREEcg/specification#126, by @constraintAutomaton.
-
The TREE profile spec TREEcg/specification#125, by @pietercolpaert.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Update wording to improve clarity on tree:member TREEcg/specification#124.
-
-
3 pull requests received 11 new comments.
-
Update wording to improve clarity on tree:view TREEcg/specification#123 (3 comments by @smessie, @xdxxxdx)
-
Defining Tree relations in terms of SPARQL algebra TREEcg/specification#126 (2 comments by @constraintAutomaton, @xdxxxdx)
Participants
-
2 participants joined.
-
Brecht Van de Vyvere (Sirus) joined.
-
Maxim Van de Wynckel joined.
-
-
1 organization joined.
-
Sirus joined.
-
GitHub
TREEcg/specification
-
3 issues opened.
-
Class tree:ViewDescription is undefined in the TREE vocabulary TREEcg/specification#122, by @rorlic.
-
Class tree:View is undefined in the TREE vocabulary TREEcg/specification#121, by @rorlic.
-
Question on LDES conformance indication TREEcg/specification#119, by @rorlic.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Question on LDES conformance indication TREEcg/specification#119.
-
-
3 issues received 4 new comments.
-
TREE relations vs. SHACL constraint components TREEcg/specification#115 (2 comments by @bergos, @pietercolpaert)
-
-
3 pull requests opened.
-
Update wording to improve clarity on tree:member TREEcg/specification#124, by @smessie.
-
Update wording to improve clarity on tree:view TREEcg/specification#123, by @smessie.
-
Tests cases specification TREEcg/specification#120, by @pietercolpaert.
-
TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape
-
2 pull requests opened.
-
Update (major) dependency versions TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape#39, by @smessie.
-
Mock fetch in unit tests to not rely on external sources TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape#38, by @smessie.
-
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
Update (major) dependency versions TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape#39.
-
Mock fetch in unit tests to not rely on external sources TREEcg/extract-cbd-shape#38.
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Thomas Bergwinkl joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
Thomas Bergwinkl left.
-
GitHub
TREEcg/site
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Update 1: emphasize LDES view is search tree TREEcg/site#14, by @ghsnd.
-
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
Update 1: emphasize LDES view is search tree TREEcg/site#14.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
-
Added blogpost "Incremental Knowledge Graph generation with YARRRML" TREEcg/site#13 (1 comment by @ajuvercr)
-
TREEcg/specification
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
-
Defining the tree:relation in terms of SPARQL algebra TREEcg/specification#116 (1 comment by @constraintAutomaton)
-