Threat Modeling Community Group - Activity in 2025
No matches.
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
xiaol bi joined.
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/threat-modeling
-
2 issues opened.
-
Fix Threath Modelling w3c-cg/threat-modeling#15, by @ghost.
-
Web User Agents w3c-cg/threat-modeling#14, by @plehegar.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Fix Threath Modelling w3c-cg/threat-modeling#15.
-
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
Past meetings
Participants
-
6 participants joined.
-
Borislav Iordanov joined.
-
Luca Lumini joined.
-
Siti Nurliza S (Sinar Project) joined.
-
พันตำรวจโทวิศิษฎ์ ทองโม้ ศาลฎีกา joined.
-
Gianluca Sassetti joined.
-
Giovanni Corti joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
พันตำรวจโทวิศิษฎ์ ทองโม้ ศาลฎีกา left.
-
-
1 organization joined.
-
Sinar Project joined.
-
Participants
-
1 participant left.
-
Will Abramson (Legendary Requirements) left.
-
Participants
-
2 participants joined.
-
Alessandro Zanetti joined.
-
Gabriela Rodriguez joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
Bala santhoshKumar Nootikoorthi (Genpact) left.
-
-
1 organization left.
-
Genpact left.
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
James Nash joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
Tommaso Innocenti left.
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/threat-modeling
-
1 issue received 4 new comments.
-
[AI] Vulnerabilities makes wrong assumptions about implementation details w3c-cg/threat-modeling#10 (4 comments by @etiennenoel, @TomCJones)
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Jason Samuel joined.
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/threat-modeling
-
1 issue opened.
-
[AI] Threat: Prompt Poisoning w3c-cg/threat-modeling#13, by @simoneonofri.
-
-
2 issues closed.
-
[AI] Clarify the "AI in the Browser" scope w3c-cg/threat-modeling#9.
-
consider renaming the threat model doc w3c-cg/threat-modeling#6.
-
-
2 issues received 5 new comments.
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
[AI] Editorials + Scoping w3c-cg/threat-modeling#12.
-
ai-in-browser Algorithmic Attacks w3c-cg/threat-modeling#11.
-
-
1 pull request received 20 new comments.
-
[AI] Editorials + Scoping w3c-cg/threat-modeling#12 (20 comments by @jyasskin, @simoneonofri, @TallTed)
-
Participants
-
1 participant left.
-
Benjamin Goering (Protocol Labs) left.
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/threat-modeling
-
1 issue reopened.
-
[AI] Vulnerabilities makes wrong assumptions about implementation details w3c-cg/threat-modeling#10, by @simoneonofri.
-
-
2 issues received 5 new comments.
-
[AI] Vulnerabilities makes wrong assumptions about implementation details w3c-cg/threat-modeling#10 (3 comments by @simoneonofri, @TomCJones)
-
[AI] Clarify the "AI in the Browser" scope w3c-cg/threat-modeling#9 (2 comments by @simoneonofri, @TomCJones)
-
-
1 pull request received 7 new comments.
-
[AI] Editorials + Scoping w3c-cg/threat-modeling#12 (7 comments by @jyasskin, @simoneonofri, @TallTed)
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Samuel Schlesinger (Google LLC) joined.
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/threat-modeling
-
3 issues received 9 new comments.
-
[AI] Clarify the "AI in the Browser" scope w3c-cg/threat-modeling#9 (4 comments by @SamuelSchlesinger, @simoneonofri, @TomCJones)
-
[AI] Vulnerabilities makes wrong assumptions about implementation details w3c-cg/threat-modeling#10 (4 comments by @etiennenoel, @jyasskin, @simoneonofri, @TomCJones)
-
[AI] The "Speed of Deployment" section seems misplaced in the AI threat model w3c-cg/threat-modeling#8 (1 comment by @SamuelSchlesinger)
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
[AI] Editorials + Scoping w3c-cg/threat-modeling#12, by @simoneonofri.
-
-
2 pull requests received 17 new comments.
GitHub
w3c-cg/threat-modeling
-
3 issues received 3 new comments.
-
[AI] The "Speed of Deployment" section seems misplaced in the AI threat model w3c-cg/threat-modeling#8 (1 comment by @TomCJones)
-
[AI] Vulnerabilities makes wrong assumptions about implementation details w3c-cg/threat-modeling#10 (1 comment by @TomCJones)
-
-
1 pull request opened.
-
ai-in-browser Algorithmic Attacks w3c-cg/threat-modeling#11, by @TomCJones.
-
Participants
-
3 participants joined.
-
Victor Lu joined.
-
Thawat Duangtakua joined.
-
Stephanie Nugent joined.
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/threat-modeling
-
4 issues opened.
-
[AI] Vulnerabilities makes wrong assumptions about implementation details w3c-cg/threat-modeling#10, by @etiennenoel.
-
[AI] Clarify the "AI in the Browser" scope w3c-cg/threat-modeling#9, by @jyasskin.
-
[AI] The "Speed of Deployment" section seems misplaced in the AI threat model w3c-cg/threat-modeling#8, by @jyasskin.
-
consider renaming the threat model doc w3c-cg/threat-modeling#6, by @dhh1128.
-
-
1 issue received 1 new comment.
-
1 pull request opened.
-
Use headings, not just bold. w3c-cg/threat-modeling#7, by @jyasskin.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
Use headings, not just bold. w3c-cg/threat-modeling#7.
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Wendy Seltzer joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
Wendy Seltzer left.
-
-
1 organization left.
-
Tucows left.
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/threat-modeling
-
2 issues opened.
-
MAP | Kaspersky Cyberthreat live map w3c-cg/threat-modeling#5, by @snstgithub.
-
SM SECURITY TEAM w3c-cg/threat-modeling#4, by @snstgithub.
-
-
2 issues closed.
-
MAP | Kaspersky Cyberthreat live map w3c-cg/threat-modeling#5.
-
SM SECURITY TEAM w3c-cg/threat-modeling#4.
-