Interledger Payments Community Group - Activity in 2017
No matches.
Participants
-
8 participants joined.
-
abhijit gaikwad joined.
-
Damian Valdez joined.
-
Sai C Cherukumilli joined.
-
Kevin Reddy joined.
-
Dave Lampton joined.
-
Robert McLeod joined.
-
Luiz Gustavo Caciatori joined.
-
Akshay Padinjarethadathil joined.
-
-
3 organizations joined.
-
RaveM8 joined.
-
Massive Interactive joined.
-
Stripe joined.
-
-
2 organizations left.
-
Massive Interactive left.
-
Geliyoo Bilisim Ar-Ge San. Tic. ve Ltd. Sti left.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
8 issues opened.
-
Should the amount (and expiry) be in the IlpPrepare? interledger/rfcs#363, by @emschwartz.
-
Conditions are NOT a ledger layer concern interledger/rfcs#359, by @justmoon.
-
Do we want to keep supporting escrow on ledgers that are not superfast and supercheap? interledger/rfcs#357, by @michielbdejong.
-
define enlightenment interledger/rfcs#356, by @michielbdejong.
-
Loss of precision (especially when trading ratios are high) interledger/rfcs#354, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
Do unconditional payment channels in connectors cause chunked payments for users? interledger/rfcs#353, by @michielbdejong.
-
Phrasing about extensions in RFC 3 can be misleading interledger/rfcs#352, by @sharafian.
-
what benefit do delivered payments provide? interledger/rfcs#348, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
17 issues closed.
-
what benefit do delivered payments provide? interledger/rfcs#348.
-
when selling apples, embrace rejection interledger/rfcs#333.
-
Do we want to keep supporting escrow on ledgers that are not superfast and supercheap? interledger/rfcs#357.
-
RFC-3: Split error data and human-readable error metadata interledger/rfcs#331.
-
CLP: Rename protocolData to subProtocolData interledger/rfcs#296.
-
Accommodating fixed receive amount and streaming payments interledger/rfcs#313.
-
RFC-4: Change RejectionMessage to match ILP (RFC-3) interledger/rfcs#332.
-
define enlightenment interledger/rfcs#356.
-
Clarify Content-Type in SideProtocol Data interledger/rfcs#286.
-
Threshold Cryptoconditions Clarifications interledger/rfcs#209.
-
Proposal: Our transport layers deal with condition generation, memo encryption, ... interledger/rfcs#43.
-
RFC-4 - Allow RejectTransfer for any incoming transfer interledger/rfcs#64.
-
RFC-10: document CCP interledger/rfcs#24.
-
RFC-8: document ILQP interledger/rfcs#23.
-
RFC-3: Remove amount field interledger/rfcs#312.
-
[CLP]: Expand CLP to Apply to Non-Trustline Peering? interledger/rfcs#293.
-
Proposal: Include data with fulfillment interledger/rfcs#314.
-
-
1 issue reopened.
-
Alter PSK to use standard HTTP/S request interledger/rfcs#215, by @emschwartz.
-
-
26 issues received 82 new comments.
-
Conditions are NOT a ledger layer concern interledger/rfcs#359 (24 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @BobWay, @dappelt, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
define enlightenment interledger/rfcs#356 (14 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
Do we want to keep supporting escrow on ledgers that are not superfast and supercheap? interledger/rfcs#357 (7 comments by @BobWay, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
what benefit do delivered payments provide? interledger/rfcs#348 (6 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
Loss of precision (especially when trading ratios are high) interledger/rfcs#354 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dora-gt, @michielbdejong, @millerabel)
-
RFC-3: Add hop limit to ILP packet interledger/rfcs#330 (3 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @sappenin)
-
Clarify Content-Type in SideProtocol Data interledger/rfcs#286 (2 comments by @emschwartz, @sappenin)
-
Threshold Cryptoconditions Clarifications interledger/rfcs#209 (2 comments by @emschwartz, @sappenin)
-
RFC-4: Change RejectionMessage to match ILP (RFC-3) interledger/rfcs#332 (2 comments by @emschwartz)
-
Should the amount (and expiry) be in the IlpPrepare? interledger/rfcs#363 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
RFC-3: Split error data and human-readable error metadata interledger/rfcs#331 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
Do unconditional payment channels in connectors cause chunked payments for users? interledger/rfcs#353 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
Proposal: Our transport layers deal with condition generation, memo encryption, ... interledger/rfcs#43 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
RFC-4 - Allow RejectTransfer for any incoming transfer interledger/rfcs#64 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
Accommodating fixed receive amount and streaming payments interledger/rfcs#313 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
-
10 pull requests opened.
-
Enlighten RFC 1 interledger/rfcs#364, by @justmoon.
-
Add RFC to explain OER choice and how to implement it interledger/rfcs#362, by @justmoon.
-
docs(asn1): ilp version 4 I guess interledger/rfcs#361, by @justmoon.
-
docs(0023): unconditional transfer type for ilp4 interledger/rfcs#360, by @sharafian.
-
Split Ledger Layer into Clearing and Settlement Layers interledger/rfcs#358, by @emschwartz.
-
docs(0003): add rejection packet interledger/rfcs#355, by @justmoon.
-
PSKv2 interledger/rfcs#351, by @emschwartz.
-
docs(0019): add definitions for streaming and chunked payments interledger/rfcs#350, by @justmoon.
-
ILP Over HTTP interledger/rfcs#349, by @emschwartz.
-
Ledger Plugin Interface v2 interledger/rfcs#347, by @justmoon.
-
-
2 pull requests merged.
-
docs(0003): add rejection packet interledger/rfcs#355.
-
feat: introduce best-effort payments (with no amount specified) interledger/rfcs#323.
-
-
5 pull requests closed.
-
Split Ledger Layer into Clearing and Settlement Layers interledger/rfcs#358.
-
Add quoting to LPI for ILP v2 interledger/rfcs#326.
-
ILP packet type for payment chunks interledger/rfcs#343.
-
LPI: Add fulfillment data, make rejection message binary interledger/rfcs#317.
-
docs(3): add Payment Too Large error interledger/rfcs#318.
-
-
1 pull request reopened.
-
feat: introduce best-effort payments (with no amount specified) interledger/rfcs#323, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
16 pull requests received 243 new comments.
-
PSKv2 interledger/rfcs#351 (78 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sentientwaffle, @sharafian)
-
Ledger Plugin Interface v2 interledger/rfcs#347 (60 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
ILP Over HTTP interledger/rfcs#349 (32 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
Add RFC to explain OER choice and how to implement it interledger/rfcs#362 (18 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @sharafian)
-
feat: introduce best-effort payments (with no amount specified) interledger/rfcs#323 (9 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
docs(0003): add rejection packet interledger/rfcs#355 (6 comments by @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sentientwaffle)
-
docs(asn1): ilp version 4 I guess interledger/rfcs#361 (6 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @sappenin)
-
Split Ledger Layer into Clearing and Settlement Layers interledger/rfcs#358 (5 comments by @BobWay, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sappenin)
-
docs(0019): add definitions for streaming and chunked payments interledger/rfcs#350 (4 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sappenin)
-
fix #328: Transfer#to excludes interactions interledger/rfcs#341 (2 comments by @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
LPI: Add fulfillment data, make rejection message binary interledger/rfcs#317 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
Participants
-
5 participants joined.
-
Chris Williams joined.
-
Taiga Nakayama joined.
-
Daniel Friedman joined.
-
Hans Christian von Stockhausen joined.
-
Michael Nagy Teodoro joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
Andrew Brown left.
-
-
2 organizations joined.
-
Geliyoo Bilisim Ar-Ge San. Tic. ve Ltd. Sti joined.
-
Viagenie joined.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
11 issues opened.
-
Signed conditions or test payments? interledger/rfcs#345, by @michielbdejong.
-
forwarded payments and the diner's dilemma interledger/rfcs#340, by @michielbdejong.
-
idea: propagating vouches interledger/rfcs#339, by @michielbdejong.
-
in psk, should hmac be taken once, or twice? interledger/rfcs#335, by @michielbdejong.
-
when selling apples, embrace rejection interledger/rfcs#333, by @michielbdejong.
-
RFC-4: Change RejectionMessage to match ILP (RFC-3) interledger/rfcs#332, by @justmoon.
-
RFC-3: Split error data and human-readable error metadata interledger/rfcs#331, by @justmoon.
-
RFC-3: Add hop limit to ILP packet interledger/rfcs#330, by @justmoon.
-
http-ilp design discussion interledger/rfcs#329, by @michielbdejong.
-
clarify relation between ILP addresses and on-ledger address in LPI interledger/rfcs#328, by @michielbdejong.
-
add destinationHoldDuration to IPR interledger/rfcs#327, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
13 issues closed.
-
forwarded payments and the diner's dilemma interledger/rfcs#340.
-
make `transfer.from` and `transfer.ledger` optional in LPI sendTransfer. interledger/rfcs#289.
-
review need for Ack in clp interledger/rfcs#283.
-
review error format in clp interledger/rfcs#282.
-
Alternative view of the Interledger layers interledger/rfcs#253.
-
0004: make Transfer#noteToSelf optional? interledger/rfcs#248.
-
Send fulfillment in `send_transfer` response interledger/rfcs#235.
-
docs(0004): deprecate `ledgerInfo.precision`? interledger/rfcs#179.
-
Should connectors be greedy? interledger/rfcs#316.
-
in psk, should hmac be taken once, or twice? interledger/rfcs#335.
-
Ideas for improving HTTP-ILP interledger/rfcs#307.
-
Use PSK instead of conditionSeed in HTTP-ILP? interledger/rfcs#310.
-
more generic `Pay` header format interledger/rfcs#325.
-
-
1 issue reopened.
-
http-ilp design discussion interledger/rfcs#329, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
22 issues received 92 new comments.
-
forwarded payments and the diner's dilemma interledger/rfcs#340 (21 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @momerath42, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
http-ilp design discussion interledger/rfcs#329 (21 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
RFC-3: Add hop limit to ILP packet interledger/rfcs#330 (18 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
more generic `Pay` header format interledger/rfcs#325 (5 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Should connectors be greedy? interledger/rfcs#316 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong)
-
Signed conditions or test payments? interledger/rfcs#345 (3 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong)
-
RFC-4: Change RejectionMessage to match ILP (RFC-3) interledger/rfcs#332 (3 comments by @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
in psk, should hmac be taken once, or twice? interledger/rfcs#335 (2 comments by @dappelt, @michielbdejong)
-
make `transfer.from` and `transfer.ledger` optional in LPI sendTransfer. interledger/rfcs#289 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
Describe how an spsp receiver can avoid keeping state interledger/rfcs#219 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
clarify relation between ILP addresses and on-ledger address in LPI interledger/rfcs#328 (1 comment by @sharafian)
-
-
9 pull requests opened.
-
[WiP] add signature info to spsp interledger/rfcs#346, by @michielbdejong.
-
fix: mention that the preimage may be known to Alice interledger/rfcs#344, by @michielbdejong.
-
ILP packet type for payment chunks interledger/rfcs#343, by @michielbdejong.
-
fix #220: clarify shared_secret non-repeating interledger/rfcs#342, by @michielbdejong.
-
fix #328: Transfer#to excludes interactions interledger/rfcs#341, by @michielbdejong.
-
docs(0004): add fulfillment data to lpi interledger/rfcs#338, by @justmoon.
-
docs(0003): add fulfillment data ilp packet interledger/rfcs#337, by @justmoon.
-
fix: breaking change to PSK spec, to match what ilp-kit does interledger/rfcs#336, by @michielbdejong.
-
feat: use interledger-psk as the payment method identifier for http-ilp interledger/rfcs#334, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
8 pull requests merged.
-
fix #220: clarify shared_secret non-repeating interledger/rfcs#342.
-
feat: use interledger-psk as the payment method identifier for http-ilp interledger/rfcs#334.
-
fix: mention that the preimage may be known to Alice interledger/rfcs#344.
-
docs(0004): add fulfillment data to lpi interledger/rfcs#338.
-
docs(0003): add fulfillment data ilp packet interledger/rfcs#337.
-
docs(asn1): enable extensibility byte for ilp errors interledger/rfcs#204.
-
fix: breaking change to PSK spec, to match what ilp-kit does interledger/rfcs#336.
-
Describe peering interledger/rfcs#243.
-
-
3 pull requests closed.
-
Add an RFC for a echo/ping mechanism interledger/rfcs#232.
-
feat: add simplified flow for http-ilp interledger/rfcs#319.
-
feat: R03 Superfluous Source Amount interledger/rfcs#320.
-
-
13 pull requests received 48 new comments.
-
docs(0003): add fulfillment data ilp packet interledger/rfcs#337 (10 comments by @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
feat: use interledger-psk as the payment method identifier for http-ilp interledger/rfcs#334 (8 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
fix #328: Transfer#to excludes interactions interledger/rfcs#341 (7 comments by @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
docs(0004): add fulfillment data to lpi interledger/rfcs#338 (6 comments by @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
ILP packet type for payment chunks interledger/rfcs#343 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong)
-
LPI: Add fulfillment data, make rejection message binary interledger/rfcs#317 (2 comments by @justmoon)
-
feat: introduce best-effort payments (with no amount specified) interledger/rfcs#323 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
Participants
-
6 participants joined.
-
Mark Connell joined.
-
Neil Appalsamy joined.
-
Pushpendra Vikram joined.
-
Ryan Gaiss joined.
-
Tien Nguyen joined.
-
Kosuke Hirano joined.
-
-
2 organizations joined.
-
P2P Cash joined.
-
Razorthink Inc. joined.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
7 issues opened.
-
more generic `Pay` header format interledger/rfcs#325, by @michielbdejong.
-
Update TOC on website interledger/rfcs#322, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
clarify how connectors can steal using InsufficientSourceAmount errors interledger/rfcs#321, by @michielbdejong.
-
Should connectors be greedy? interledger/rfcs#316, by @michielbdejong.
-
Proposal: Include data with fulfillment interledger/rfcs#314, by @justmoon.
-
Accommodating fixed receive amount and streaming payments interledger/rfcs#313, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
RFC-3: Remove amount field interledger/rfcs#312, by @justmoon.
-
-
2 issues closed.
-
RFC 21: Switch to OER encoding interledger/rfcs#249.
-
9 issues received 104 new comments.
-
RFC-3: Remove amount field interledger/rfcs#312 (41 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Proposal: Include data with fulfillment interledger/rfcs#314 (27 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
Should connectors be greedy? interledger/rfcs#316 (18 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Proposal: Connectors should forward (not deliver) ILP packets with amounts equal to the max uint64 interledger/rfcs#311 (8 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sappenin)
-
more generic `Pay` header format interledger/rfcs#325 (3 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Accommodating fixed receive amount and streaming payments interledger/rfcs#313 (3 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong)
-
clarify how connectors can steal using InsufficientSourceAmount errors interledger/rfcs#321 (2 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
-
8 pull requests opened.
-
Add quoting to LPI for ILP v2 interledger/rfcs#326, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
Fix typos. interledger/rfcs#324, by @jasondavies.
-
feat: introduce best-effort payments (with no amount specified) interledger/rfcs#323, by @michielbdejong.
-
feat: R03 Superfluous Source Amount interledger/rfcs#320, by @michielbdejong.
-
feat: add simplified flow for http-ilp interledger/rfcs#319, by @michielbdejong.
-
docs(3): add Payment Too Large error interledger/rfcs#318, by @emschwartz.
-
LPI: Add fulfillment data, make rejection message binary interledger/rfcs#317, by @emschwartz.
-
docs: describe how competition ensures network health interledger/rfcs#315, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
4 pull requests merged.
-
Updated HTTP-ILP (Continuation of #149) interledger/rfcs#306.
-
Fix typos. interledger/rfcs#324.
-
Apply changes from last night's meeting interledger/rfcs#300.
-
fix: ILP Packet -> InterledgerProtocolPayment interledger/rfcs#272.
-
-
3 pull requests closed.
-
Initial version of a spec providing ILP payments for HTTP calls interledger/rfcs#149.
-
ILQPv2: Replace ILQP with End-to-End Quoting interledger/rfcs#309.
-
docs: describe how competition ensures network health interledger/rfcs#315.
-
-
17 pull requests received 130 new comments.
-
ILQPv2: Replace ILQP with End-to-End Quoting interledger/rfcs#309 (23 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
feat: introduce best-effort payments (with no amount specified) interledger/rfcs#323 (20 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
Updated HTTP-ILP (Continuation of #149) interledger/rfcs#306 (17 comments by @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
docs: describe how competition ensures network health interledger/rfcs#315 (17 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
docs(3): add Payment Too Large error interledger/rfcs#318 (15 comments by @dappelt, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sappenin)
-
feat: R03 Superfluous Source Amount interledger/rfcs#320 (12 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
LPI: Add fulfillment data, make rejection message binary interledger/rfcs#317 (6 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
Add quoting to LPI for ILP v2 interledger/rfcs#326 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong)
-
feat: add simplified flow for http-ilp interledger/rfcs#319 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Initial version of a spec providing ILP payments for HTTP calls interledger/rfcs#149 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
docs(asn1): enable extensibility byte for ilp errors interledger/rfcs#204 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
Add InterledgerProtocolFulfillment packet definition interledger/rfcs#279 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
Participants
-
3 participants joined.
-
Redouane Sassioui joined.
-
Djamal Labib joined.
-
yutaka ohtake joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
Djamal Labib left.
-
-
3 organizations joined.
-
EVRYTHNG joined.
-
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) joined.
-
Pentandra Research Solutions, Inc. joined.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
15 issues opened.
-
Use PSK instead of conditionSeed in HTTP-ILP? interledger/rfcs#310, by @michielbdejong.
-
Ideas for improving HTTP-ILP interledger/rfcs#307, by @michielbdejong.
-
BTP Spec: Typo for ILQP subprotocol? interledger/rfcs#303, by @sappenin.
-
Clarify how to recognize different error types in from LPI interledger/rfcs#302, by @michielbdejong.
-
Cleanup BTP Error Codes interledger/rfcs#301, by @sappenin.
-
CLP/BTP Authentication interledger/rfcs#299, by @dappelt.
-
Support bulk-fulfill? interledger/rfcs#298, by @michielbdejong.
-
remove `rejectionReason` from `Reject` in BTP interledger/rfcs#297, by @michielbdejong.
-
CLP: Rename protocolData to subProtocolData interledger/rfcs#296, by @sappenin.
-
[CLP]: Don't use the term "packet" and "message" interchangeably in the RFC interledger/rfcs#295, by @dappelt.
-
[BTP]: Indicate protocol version at connection establishment interledger/rfcs#294, by @dappelt.
-
[CLP]: Expand CLP to Apply to Non-Trustline Peering? interledger/rfcs#293, by @sappenin.
-
[CLP]: Merge Error and Response Into a Single Object interledger/rfcs#292, by @sappenin.
-
[clp] should error responses be `Error`s or `Response`s? interledger/rfcs#290, by @michielbdejong.
-
7 issues closed.
-
CLP/BTP Authentication interledger/rfcs#299.
-
Remove .to, .ledger and .outgoing from Transfer and Request objects interledger/rfcs#234.
-
remove `rejectionReason` from `Reject` in BTP interledger/rfcs#297.
-
[CLP]: Don't use the term "packet" and "message" interchangeably in the RFC interledger/rfcs#295.
-
[clp] should error responses be `Error`s or `Response`s? interledger/rfcs#290.
-
[CLP]: Merge Error and Response Into a Single Object interledger/rfcs#292.
-
[clp] Use packet.data.protocolData even if it's the only field in packet.data? interledger/rfcs#284.
-
-
1 issue reopened.
-
BTP Spec: Typo for ILQP subprotocol? interledger/rfcs#303, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
-
17 issues received 87 new comments.
-
CLP/BTP Authentication interledger/rfcs#299 (17 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
[clp] should error responses be `Error`s or `Response`s? interledger/rfcs#290 (13 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
Support bulk-fulfill? interledger/rfcs#298 (9 comments by @dappelt, @emschwartz, @mDuo13, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Ideas for improving HTTP-ILP interledger/rfcs#307 (8 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
BTP Spec: Typo for ILQP subprotocol? interledger/rfcs#303 (6 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
[BTP]: Indicate protocol version at connection establishment interledger/rfcs#294 (6 comments by @dappelt, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
make `transfer.from` and `transfer.ledger` optional in LPI sendTransfer. interledger/rfcs#289 (5 comments by @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Cleanup BTP Error Codes interledger/rfcs#301 (5 comments by @dappelt, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
[CLP]: Merge Error and Response Into a Single Object interledger/rfcs#292 (4 comments by @dappelt, @sappenin)
-
[CLP]: Don't use the term "packet" and "message" interchangeably in the RFC interledger/rfcs#295 (3 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @michielbdejong)
-
Mark the PrepareTransferRequest.executionCondition as Optional? interledger/rfcs#287 (3 comments by @dappelt, @michielbdejong)
-
remove `rejectionReason` from `Reject` in BTP interledger/rfcs#297 (2 comments by @dappelt, @michielbdejong)
-
[CLP]: Expand CLP to Apply to Non-Trustline Peering? interledger/rfcs#293 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
Remove .to, .ledger and .outgoing from Transfer and Request objects interledger/rfcs#234 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
[clp] Use packet.data.protocolData even if it's the only field in packet.data? interledger/rfcs#284 (1 comment by @sharafian)
-
-
7 pull requests opened.
-
ILQPv2: Replace ILQP with End-to-End Quoting interledger/rfcs#309, by @emschwartz.
-
docs(index): emphasize BTP over plugin RPC API and Five Bells interledger/rfcs#308, by @emschwartz.
-
Updated HTTP-ILP (Continuation of #149) interledger/rfcs#306, by @michielbdejong.
-
fix: clarify changes from #304 interledger/rfcs#305, by @michielbdejong.
-
docs(0004): noteToSelf, custom are optional interledger/rfcs#304, by @emschwartz.
-
Apply changes from last night's meeting interledger/rfcs#300, by @michielbdejong.
-
feat: document the BTP interledger/rfcs#291, by @sharafian.
-
-
5 pull requests merged.
-
docs(index): emphasize BTP over plugin RPC API and Five Bells interledger/rfcs#308.
-
fix: clarify changes from #304 interledger/rfcs#305.
-
docs(0004): noteToSelf, custom are optional interledger/rfcs#304.
-
feat: document the BTP interledger/rfcs#291.
-
feat: puts protocolData inside of a sequence interledger/rfcs#285.
-
-
4 pull requests closed.
-
Add message layer interledger/rfcs#266.
-
Suggested changes to protocol stack and CLP interledger/rfcs#270.
-
crypto-conditions: Add SECP256K1-SHA-256 fulfillment interledger/rfcs#142.
-
Add InterledgerProtocolFulfillment packet definition interledger/rfcs#279.
-
-
13 pull requests received 177 new comments.
-
feat: document the BTP interledger/rfcs#291 (104 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @earizon, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
ILQPv2: Replace ILQP with End-to-End Quoting interledger/rfcs#309 (26 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @diminator, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sentientwaffle, @sharafian)
-
Apply changes from last night's meeting interledger/rfcs#300 (20 comments by @dappelt, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Initial version of a spec providing ILP payments for HTTP calls interledger/rfcs#149 (9 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Updated HTTP-ILP (Continuation of #149) interledger/rfcs#306 (6 comments by @emschwartz, @sharafian)
-
fix: ILP Packet -> InterledgerProtocolPayment interledger/rfcs#272 (4 comments by @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
docs(asn1): enable extensibility byte for ilp errors interledger/rfcs#204 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
crypto-conditions: Add SECP256K1-SHA-256 fulfillment interledger/rfcs#142 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
Add InterledgerProtocolFulfillment packet definition interledger/rfcs#279 (1 comment by @adrianhopebailie)
-
Participants
-
7 participants joined.
-
Kunio Tsubonuma joined.
-
CHANG HWAN LEE joined.
-
Juri Dmitrijev joined.
-
Ajay Rambocus joined.
-
Koji Machi joined.
-
Francis Walugembe joined.
-
Roy Hodge Roy Hodge joined.
-
-
3 organizations joined.
-
Kodebox joined.
-
Virtual Organization Management Institute joined.
-
Extropy.IO joined.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
10 issues opened.
-
make `transfer.from` and `transfer.ledger` optional in LPI sendTransfer. interledger/rfcs#289, by @michielbdejong.
-
Mark the PrepareTransferRequest.executionCondition as Optional? interledger/rfcs#287, by @sappenin.
-
Clarify Content-Type in SideProtocol Data interledger/rfcs#286, by @sappenin.
-
[clp] Use packet.data.protocolData even if it's the only field in packet.data? interledger/rfcs#284, by @michielbdejong.
-
review need for Ack in clp interledger/rfcs#283, by @michielbdejong.
-
review error format in clp interledger/rfcs#282, by @michielbdejong.
-
Defining the ecosystem: ILSPs and Wallets interledger/rfcs#280, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
RFC-20 - Number of boxes passed to the connector interledger/rfcs#277, by @elmurci.
-
RFC-20 - Arranged password in Example Payment interledger/rfcs#274, by @elmurci.
-
PSK destination account has two wasted bits interledger/rfcs#273, by @dappelt.
-
-
7 issues closed.
-
Mark the PrepareTransferRequest.executionCondition as Optional? interledger/rfcs#287.
-
RFC-20 - Number of boxes passed to the connector interledger/rfcs#277.
-
(chore) Produce complete ASN.1 module and embed in HTML page interledger/rfcs#216.
-
Put versioning information in RFCs interledger/rfcs#201.
-
Update generate_web.js to remove *.md from links in RFCs and ensure they are relative interledger/rfcs#191.
-
add RequestHandlerAlreadyRegisteredError to Errors section in IL-RFC4 interledger/rfcs#229.
-
RFC8 and ASN1. GeneralizedTime usage interledger/rfcs#230.
-
-
10 issues received 30 new comments.
-
[clp] Use packet.data.protocolData even if it's the only field in packet.data? interledger/rfcs#284 (6 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sappenin)
-
Defining the ecosystem: ILSPs and Wallets interledger/rfcs#280 (6 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz)
-
PSK destination account has two wasted bits interledger/rfcs#273 (5 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @sharafian)
-
Mark the PrepareTransferRequest.executionCondition as Optional? interledger/rfcs#287 (3 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sappenin)
-
RFC-20 - Arranged password in Example Payment interledger/rfcs#274 (3 comments by @elmurci, @professorhantzen)
-
RFC-20 - Number of boxes passed to the connector interledger/rfcs#277 (2 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @professorhantzen)
-
add RequestHandlerAlreadyRegisteredError to Errors section in IL-RFC4 interledger/rfcs#229 (1 comment by @sentientwaffle)
-
-
26 pull requests opened.
-
fix: html targets for {Incoming,Outgoing}Transfer interledger/rfcs#288, by @michielbdejong.
-
feat: puts protocolData inside of a sequence interledger/rfcs#285, by @dappelt.
-
docs(0004): add plugin InsufficientBalanceError interledger/rfcs#281, by @sentientwaffle.
-
Add InterledgerProtocolFulfillment packet definition interledger/rfcs#279, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
Minor corrections interledger/rfcs#278, by @professorhantzen.
-
fix: asn1 corrections interledger/rfcs#276, by @michielbdejong.
-
chore: check ASN syntax in CI; generate ASN docs interledger/rfcs#275, by @sentientwaffle.
-
fix: ILP Packet -> InterledgerProtocolPayment interledger/rfcs#272, by @michielbdejong.
-
docs: introduce CommonLedgerProtocol interledger/rfcs#271, by @michielbdejong.
-
Suggested changes to protocol stack and CLP interledger/rfcs#270, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
Strawman: add balance protocol on clp level interledger/rfcs#269, by @michielbdejong.
-
fix: align CustomRequest with Ack interledger/rfcs#268, by @michielbdejong.
-
CLP comments interledger/rfcs#267, by @michielbdejong.
-
Add message layer interledger/rfcs#266, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
docs(0010): describe current path choosing algorithm interledger/rfcs#265, by @michielbdejong.
-
Reduce CLP to the French Five interledger/rfcs#264, by @michielbdejong.
-
Rename LLL to Common Ledger Protocol interledger/rfcs#263, by @emschwartz.
-
LLL with ILP packet payloads interledger/rfcs#262, by @michielbdejong.
-
docs(asn1): add to/from to LLL request interledger/rfcs#261, by @emschwartz.
-
Proposal: Interledger RPC (instead of LLL) interledger/rfcs#260, by @emschwartz.
-
fix: include the correct class name interledger/rfcs#259, by @michielbdejong.
-
docs(0004): RequestHandlerAlreadyRegisteredError interledger/rfcs#258, by @sentientwaffle.
-
docs: specifies allowed characters in headers and values interledger/rfcs#257, by @dappelt.
-
renumber LLL packets to reuse ILP packets directly interledger/rfcs#256, by @michielbdejong.
-
strawman: merge LLL message types registry here interledger/rfcs#255, by @michielbdejong.
-
docs(21): make RPC API into LPI-over-HTTP interledger/rfcs#254, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
14 pull requests merged.
-
fix: html targets for {Incoming,Outgoing}Transfer interledger/rfcs#288.
-
docs: introduce CommonLedgerProtocol interledger/rfcs#271.
-
docs(0004): add plugin InsufficientBalanceError interledger/rfcs#281.
-
Minor corrections interledger/rfcs#278.
-
docs(0010): describe current path choosing algorithm interledger/rfcs#265.
-
chore: check ASN syntax in CI; generate ASN docs interledger/rfcs#275.
-
fix: asn1 corrections interledger/rfcs#276.
-
fix: align CustomRequest with Ack interledger/rfcs#268.
-
Five Bells Ledger API interledger/rfcs#237.
-
CLP comments interledger/rfcs#267.
-
fix: include the correct class name interledger/rfcs#259.
-
docs: specifies allowed characters in headers and values interledger/rfcs#257.
-
docs(0004): RequestHandlerAlreadyRegisteredError interledger/rfcs#258.
-
feat: fix a time format and zone for Interledger Timestamp interledger/rfcs#250.
-
-
11 pull requests closed.
-
docs: introduce ledger-ledger lotocol interledger/rfcs#251.
-
Rename LLL to Common Ledger Protocol interledger/rfcs#263.
-
Strawman: add balance protocol on clp level interledger/rfcs#269.
-
feat: remove .ledger, .to, and .direction interledger/rfcs#236.
-
Reduce CLP to the French Five interledger/rfcs#264.
-
renumber LLL packets to reuse ILP packets directly interledger/rfcs#256.
-
LLL with ILP packet payloads interledger/rfcs#262.
-
docs(asn1): add to/from to LLL request interledger/rfcs#261.
-
docs(21): make RPC API into LPI-over-HTTP interledger/rfcs#254.
-
Proposal: Interledger RPC (instead of LLL) interledger/rfcs#260.
-
strawman: merge LLL message types registry here interledger/rfcs#255.
-
-
31 pull requests received 286 new comments.
-
docs: introduce CommonLedgerProtocol interledger/rfcs#271 (70 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
Rename LLL to Common Ledger Protocol interledger/rfcs#263 (34 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
docs: introduce ledger-ledger lotocol interledger/rfcs#251 (30 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
docs(21): make RPC API into LPI-over-HTTP interledger/rfcs#254 (23 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
renumber LLL packets to reuse ILP packets directly interledger/rfcs#256 (18 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
Add message layer interledger/rfcs#266 (15 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Reduce CLP to the French Five interledger/rfcs#264 (11 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
fix: ILP Packet -> InterledgerProtocolPayment interledger/rfcs#272 (10 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Suggested changes to protocol stack and CLP interledger/rfcs#270 (9 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
LLL with ILP packet payloads interledger/rfcs#262 (8 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Add InterledgerProtocolFulfillment packet definition interledger/rfcs#279 (6 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @dappelt, @emschwartz)
-
docs(asn1): add to/from to LLL request interledger/rfcs#261 (6 comments by @dappelt, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
chore: check ASN syntax in CI; generate ASN docs interledger/rfcs#275 (5 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong, @sentientwaffle)
-
Strawman: add balance protocol on clp level interledger/rfcs#269 (5 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
docs(0004): RequestHandlerAlreadyRegisteredError interledger/rfcs#258 (5 comments by @michielbdejong, @sentientwaffle)
-
docs(asn1): enable extensibility byte for ilp errors interledger/rfcs#204 (5 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sentientwaffle)
-
docs(0010): describe current path choosing algorithm interledger/rfcs#265 (4 comments by @michielbdejong, @sentientwaffle)
-
fix: html targets for {Incoming,Outgoing}Transfer interledger/rfcs#288 (2 comments by @dappelt, @michielbdejong)
-
feat: puts protocolData inside of a sequence interledger/rfcs#285 (2 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong)
-
feat: fix a time format and zone for Interledger Timestamp interledger/rfcs#250 (2 comments by @andrew-g-za)
-
docs: specifies allowed characters in headers and values interledger/rfcs#257 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
Participants
-
5 participants joined.
-
Max Main joined.
-
Weiso Chen joined.
-
Daniela Jindra joined.
-
Jeremie Dubois-Lacoste joined.
-
Aman Singh joined.
-
-
1 organization joined.
-
Columbia University joined.
-
-
1 organization left.
-
Columbia University left.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
7 issues opened.
-
Alternative view of the Interledger layers interledger/rfcs#253, by @michielbdejong.
-
RFC-3: Should limit size of name and forwardedBy fields in ILP error messages interledger/rfcs#252, by @justmoon.
-
RFC 21: Switch to OER encoding interledger/rfcs#249, by @emschwartz.
-
0004: make Transfer#noteToSelf optional? interledger/rfcs#248, by @michielbdejong.
-
sendRequest example violates json-schema interledger/rfcs#241, by @michielbdejong.
-
Send fulfillment in `send_transfer` response interledger/rfcs#235, by @michielbdejong.
-
Remove .to, .ledger and .outgoing from Transfer and Request objects interledger/rfcs#234, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
sendRequest example violates json-schema interledger/rfcs#241.
-
-
6 issues received 34 new comments.
-
Remove .to, .ledger and .outgoing from Transfer and Request objects interledger/rfcs#234 (16 comments by @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
RFC 21: Switch to OER encoding interledger/rfcs#249 (7 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @jimmiebfulton, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian)
-
0004: make Transfer#noteToSelf optional? interledger/rfcs#248 (4 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Send fulfillment in `send_transfer` response interledger/rfcs#235 (3 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
RFC8 and ASN1. GeneralizedTime usage interledger/rfcs#230 (2 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @sappenin)
-
-
15 pull requests opened.
-
docs: introduce ledger-ledger lotocol interledger/rfcs#251, by @justmoon.
-
feat: fix a time format and zone for Interledger Timestamp interledger/rfcs#250, by @andrew-g-za.
-
docs(0004): fix field links interledger/rfcs#247, by @michielbdejong.
-
docs: categorize specs in readme interledger/rfcs#246, by @emschwartz.
-
fixes JSON examples interledger/rfcs#245, by @dappelt.
-
replaces sender with receiver interledger/rfcs#244, by @dappelt.
-
Describe peering interledger/rfcs#243, by @michielbdejong.
-
Tweak RFCs template interledger/rfcs#242, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
fix: clarify role of timeout interledger/rfcs#240, by @michielbdejong.
-
fix: remove redundant "each" interledger/rfcs#239, by @michielbdejong.
-
fix: remove redundant "each" interledger/rfcs#238, by @sbellem.
-
Five Bells Ledger API interledger/rfcs#237, by @mDuo13.
-
feat: remove .ledger, .to, and .direction interledger/rfcs#236, by @michielbdejong.
-
Add example of route broadcast interledger/rfcs#233, by @michielbdejong.
-
Add an RFC for a echo/ping mechanism interledger/rfcs#232, by @justmoon.
-
-
12 pull requests merged.
-
docs(0004): fix field links interledger/rfcs#247.
-
docs: categorize specs in readme interledger/rfcs#246.
-
Add Hashed-Timelock Agreement (HTLA) doc interledger/rfcs#231.
-
fixes JSON examples interledger/rfcs#245.
-
replaces sender with receiver interledger/rfcs#244.
-
Tweak RFCs template interledger/rfcs#242.
-
fix: clarify role of timeout interledger/rfcs#240.
-
Add versioning to RFCs interledger/rfcs#206.
-
fix: remove redundant "each" interledger/rfcs#238.
-
fix: remove redundant "each" interledger/rfcs#239.
-
Add example of route broadcast interledger/rfcs#233.
-
Docs: add plugin virtual RPC API interledger/rfcs#224.
-
-
2 pull requests closed.
-
Five Bells Ledger API specification interledger/rfcs#125.
-
RFC-3: ILP Packet explanation interledger/rfcs#176.
-
-
16 pull requests received 108 new comments.
-
Add Hashed-Timelock Agreement (HTLA) doc interledger/rfcs#231 (27 comments by @emschwartz, @mDuo13, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sharafian, @zmanian)
-
Five Bells Ledger API interledger/rfcs#237 (25 comments by @dappelt, @emschwartz, @mDuo13, @sentientwaffle)
-
docs: introduce ledger-ledger lotocol interledger/rfcs#251 (16 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
Add an RFC for a echo/ping mechanism interledger/rfcs#232 (13 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
Docs: add plugin virtual RPC API interledger/rfcs#224 (3 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong, @spolu)
-
feat: fix a time format and zone for Interledger Timestamp interledger/rfcs#250 (2 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @andrew-g-za)
-
crypto-conditions: Add SECP256K1-SHA-256 fulfillment interledger/rfcs#142 (2 comments by @michielbdejong, @stevenroose)
-
Participants
-
7 participants joined.
-
Nabil Babaci joined.
-
Hall Charter joined.
-
Robert Benjamin Finlay joined.
-
Prateek Parmar joined.
-
Timothy C Siwula joined.
-
Jermaine Anderson joined.
-
Romero Lijkwan joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
Oscar Hernandez left.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
7 issues opened.
-
RFC8 and ASN1. GeneralizedTime usage interledger/rfcs#230, by @andrew-g-za.
-
add RequestHandlerAlreadyRegisteredError to Errors section in IL-RFC4 interledger/rfcs#229, by @michielbdejong.
-
Question - RFC8 ILQP terminology and quote routing interledger/rfcs#225, by @andrew-g-za.
-
make transaction id idempotency optional in LPI interledger/rfcs#223, by @michielbdejong.
-
pubkey@address format interledger/rfcs#222, by @michielbdejong.
-
spsp: emphasize need to use a different shared_secret each time interledger/rfcs#220, by @michielbdejong.
-
Describe how an spsp receiver can avoid keeping state interledger/rfcs#219, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
Question - RFC8 ILQP terminology and quote routing interledger/rfcs#225.
-
-
4 issues received 11 new comments.
-
pubkey@address format interledger/rfcs#222 (6 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
Question - RFC8 ILQP terminology and quote routing interledger/rfcs#225 (2 comments by @andrew-g-za, @michielbdejong)
-
Describe how an spsp receiver can avoid keeping state interledger/rfcs#219 (2 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
-
6 pull requests opened.
-
Add Hashed-Timelock Agreement (HTLA) doc interledger/rfcs#231, by @emschwartz.
-
Merge #198 interledger/rfcs#228, by @michielbdejong.
-
Remove regexes from table for MD compatibility interledger/rfcs#227, by @mDuo13.
-
docs(0008): final/destination != next/outgoing interledger/rfcs#226, by @michielbdejong.
-
Docs: add plugin virtual RPC API interledger/rfcs#224, by @sharafian.
-
Describe routing in C2C interledger/rfcs#221, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
5 pull requests merged.
-
Merge #198 interledger/rfcs#228.
-
Remove regexes from table for MD compatibility interledger/rfcs#227.
-
docs(0008): final/destination != next/outgoing interledger/rfcs#226.
-
docs(0008): ILQP binary messages interledger/rfcs#218.
-
Describe routing in C2C interledger/rfcs#221.
-
-
1 pull request closed.
-
RFC-4: Request/response semantics interledger/rfcs#198.
-
-
4 pull requests received 31 new comments.
-
Add Hashed-Timelock Agreement (HTLA) doc interledger/rfcs#231 (14 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @mDuo13)
-
Docs: add plugin virtual RPC API interledger/rfcs#224 (8 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
RFC-4: Request/response semantics interledger/rfcs#198 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong)
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
5 issues opened.
-
(chore) Produce complete ASN.1 module and embed in HTML page interledger/rfcs#216, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
Alter PSK to use standard HTTP/S request interledger/rfcs#215, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
RFC-9 : Someway to message btw recievers and senders interledger/rfcs#214, by @ghost.
-
Threshold Cryptoconditions Clarifications interledger/rfcs#209, by @nbougalis.
-
clarify meaning of `destination_ledger` in quote response interledger/rfcs#207, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
clarify meaning of `destination_ledger` in quote response interledger/rfcs#207.
-
-
4 issues received 14 new comments.
-
clarify meaning of `destination_ledger` in quote response interledger/rfcs#207 (7 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong)
-
RFC 0016: Should public headers be removed from PSK? interledger/rfcs#197 (5 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @mDuo13)
-
(chore) Produce complete ASN.1 module and embed in HTML page interledger/rfcs#216 (1 comment by @adrianhopebailie)
-
-
8 pull requests opened.
-
docs(0008): ILQP binary messages interledger/rfcs#218, by @sentientwaffle.
-
Fixes some minor typos in the ASN1 interledger/rfcs#217, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
feat: add optional plugin.getInfo().{min,max}Balance interledger/rfcs#213, by @michielbdejong.
-
docs(0020): add Interledger: Explain Like I'm Five (ELI5) interledger/rfcs#212, by @emschwartz.
-
Copy asn1 files to web during publish interledger/rfcs#211, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
docs(0008): fix link to ASN1 document interledger/rfcs#210, by @michielbdejong.
-
Update quote_response, fix #207 interledger/rfcs#208, by @michielbdejong.
-
Add versioning to RFCs interledger/rfcs#206, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
-
7 pull requests merged.
-
Fixes some minor typos in the ASN1 interledger/rfcs#217.
-
feat: add optional plugin.getInfo().{min,max}Balance interledger/rfcs#213.
-
docs(0020): add Interledger: Explain Like I'm Five (ELI5) interledger/rfcs#212.
-
Copy asn1 files to web during publish interledger/rfcs#211.
-
Fix Heading Styles interledger/rfcs#205.
-
Update quote_response, fix #207 interledger/rfcs#208.
-
C2C and ILQP to integers interledger/rfcs#203.
-
-
3 pull requests closed.
-
Interledger: Explain Like I'm Five (ELI5) interledger/rfcs#193.
-
docs(0008): fix link to ASN1 document interledger/rfcs#210.
-
Describe live situation interledger/rfcs#199.
-
-
13 pull requests received 63 new comments.
-
docs(0008): ILQP binary messages interledger/rfcs#218 (24 comments by @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sentientwaffle)
-
Update quote_response, fix #207 interledger/rfcs#208 (10 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong)
-
Add versioning to RFCs interledger/rfcs#206 (8 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
docs(0020): add Interledger: Explain Like I'm Five (ELI5) interledger/rfcs#212 (3 comments by @emschwartz, @ghost, @professorhantzen)
-
Fixes some minor typos in the ASN1 interledger/rfcs#217 (3 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon)
-
feat: add optional plugin.getInfo().{min,max}Balance interledger/rfcs#213 (3 comments by @michielbdejong, @momerath42, @sharafian)
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Ankit Parashar joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
Ethan Hornbecker left.
-
-
3 organizations joined.
-
NVIDIA joined.
-
Aalto University joined.
-
Intrepid ventures joined.
-
-
1 organization left.
-
Intrepid ventures left.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
10 issues opened.
-
Map Interledger error codes to HTTP error codes interledger/rfcs#202, by @earizon.
-
Put versioning information in RFCs interledger/rfcs#201, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
RFC 0016: Should public headers be removed from PSK? interledger/rfcs#197, by @sharafian.
-
Question - exact format of PSK headers and header boundary. interledger/rfcs#196, by @andrew-g-za.
-
Rename asn1/InterledgerProtocol.asn as asn1/InterledgerPaymentProtocol.asn interledger/rfcs#195, by @earizon.
-
Move InterledgerProtocolError to its own file and reuse for all protocols interledger/rfcs#194, by @earizon.
-
Update generate_web.js to remove *.md from links in RFCs and ensure they are relative interledger/rfcs#191, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
Question: Clarify ILP Packet Design interledger/rfcs#189, by @sappenin.
-
Proposal: Remove (or clarify) "data" field from ILPError in IL-RFC-3 specification interledger/rfcs#188, by @sappenin.
-
PSK - AES/GCM requirements clarification interledger/rfcs#187, by @andrew-g-za.
-
-
5 issues closed.
-
PSK - AES/GCM requirements clarification interledger/rfcs#187.
-
Proposal: Remove (or clarify) "data" field from ILPError in IL-RFC-3 specification interledger/rfcs#188.
-
establish names for hops etc. interledger/rfcs#180.
-
Proposal: Connector forwarding/delivery distinction interledger/rfcs#77.
-
RFC 4: Use Common Ledger API Transfer object instead of separate Transfer abstraction interledger/rfcs#139.
-
-
9 issues received 34 new comments.
-
Question - exact format of PSK headers and header boundary. interledger/rfcs#196 (12 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon, @sharafian)
-
establish names for hops etc. interledger/rfcs#180 (6 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @professorhantzen)
-
Update generate_web.js to remove *.md from links in RFCs and ensure they are relative interledger/rfcs#191 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz)
-
Question: Clarify ILP Packet Design interledger/rfcs#189 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @sappenin)
-
Put versioning information in RFCs interledger/rfcs#201 (2 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @michielbdejong)
-
PSK - AES/GCM requirements clarification interledger/rfcs#187 (2 comments by @andrew-g-za, @sharafian)
-
Proposal: Remove (or clarify) "data" field from ILPError in IL-RFC-3 specification interledger/rfcs#188 (2 comments by @sappenin)
-
Generalize ledgerInfo and spsp to support any asset type interledger/rfcs#182 (1 comment by @michielbdejong)
-
RFC 4: Use Common Ledger API Transfer object instead of separate Transfer abstraction interledger/rfcs#139 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
-
12 pull requests opened.
-
Fix Heading Styles interledger/rfcs#205, by @sappenin.
-
docs(asn1): enable extensibility byte for ilp errors interledger/rfcs#204, by @justmoon.
-
C2C and ILQP to integers interledger/rfcs#203, by @michielbdejong.
-
[do not merge] restore ilqp to prescribing interledger/rfcs#200, by @michielbdejong.
-
Describe live situation interledger/rfcs#199, by @michielbdejong.
-
RFC-4: Request/response semantics interledger/rfcs#198, by @justmoon.
-
Interledger: Explain Like I'm Five (ELI5) interledger/rfcs#193, by @professorhantzen.
-
Fixes relative links across all rfcs's. interledger/rfcs#192, by @ivanseidel.
-
Docs: specify size of auth tag and encryption padding in PSK interledger/rfcs#190, by @sharafian.
-
Add Bluetooth Payment Protocol Draft interledger/rfcs#186, by @ivanseidel.
-
Docs: add dump() to LPI store interledger/rfcs#185, by @sharafian.
-
docs(0019): Glossary interledger/rfcs#184, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
6 pull requests merged.
-
Fixes relative links across all rfcs's. interledger/rfcs#192.
-
docs(0019): Glossary interledger/rfcs#184.
-
Docs: specify size of auth tag and encryption padding in PSK interledger/rfcs#190.
-
Add RFC 18: Connector Risk Mitigations interledger/rfcs#183.
-
Overhaul architecture overview, separate ledger requirements interledger/rfcs#181.
-
-
3 pull requests closed.
-
[do not merge] restore ilqp to prescribing interledger/rfcs#200.
-
Earizon seq diagram0004 interledger/rfcs#140.
-
Docs: add dump() to LPI store interledger/rfcs#185.
-
-
14 pull requests received 130 new comments.
-
docs(0019): Glossary interledger/rfcs#184 (52 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sappenin)
-
Add Bluetooth Payment Protocol Draft interledger/rfcs#186 (35 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @ivanseidel, @joaopedrovbs, @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
Interledger: Explain Like I'm Five (ELI5) interledger/rfcs#193 (13 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @professorhantzen)
-
RFC-4: Request/response semantics interledger/rfcs#198 (8 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @sentientwaffle)
-
docs(0004,0009): Rename scale to currencyScale, deprecate currencySymbol, deprecate precision interledger/rfcs#177 (6 comments by @justmoon, @michielbdejong)
-
Docs: specify size of auth tag and encryption padding in PSK interledger/rfcs#190 (3 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz)
-
Fixes relative links across all rfcs's. interledger/rfcs#192 (2 comments by @ivanseidel, @michielbdejong)
-
Overhaul architecture overview, separate ledger requirements interledger/rfcs#181 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
Participants
-
6 participants joined.
-
Oscar Hernandez joined.
-
Jean-Francois Jobidon joined.
-
Sam Azer joined.
-
Igor Kostyuchenok joined.
-
Alexandre Nicastro joined.
-
Didier Martin joined.
-
-
3 participants left.
-
Alexandre Nicastro left.
-
Tony Arcieri left.
-
CHANG HWAN LEE left.
-
-
4 organizations joined.
-
Chain joined.
-
eBank Ltd joined.
-
Crowdz joined.
-
Calypso Technology joined.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
5 issues opened.
-
Generalize ledgerInfo and spsp to support any asset type interledger/rfcs#182, by @michielbdejong.
-
establish names for hops etc. interledger/rfcs#180, by @michielbdejong.
-
docs(0004): deprecate `ledgerInfo.precision`? interledger/rfcs#179, by @michielbdejong.
-
support for temporary ledgers? interledger/rfcs#171, by @michielbdejong.
-
'ping' message method interledger/rfcs#167, by @michielbdejong.
-
-
14 issues closed.
-
Proposal: Define ILP Errors interledger/rfcs#150.
-
Proposal: we need an Interledger Packet -- not just an ILP Header interledger/rfcs#146.
-
RFC-4: Make it clear that this document is JS specific interledger/rfcs#47.
-
RFC 11: IPRs should be Interledger Packets interledger/rfcs#138.
-
RFC9: What is SPSP? interledger/rfcs#152.
-
support for temporary ledgers? interledger/rfcs#171.
-
Proposal: ILP Address Mapping interledger/rfcs#31.
-
PROPOSAL: Map ILP Addresses to existing accounts on existing networks interledger/rfcs#81.
-
Add 'balance' event interledger/rfcs#26.
-
RFC-3: Proposal especify Ilpamount with integers interledger/rfcs#34.
-
RFC-11: Add multi-payments to Interactive Transport interledger/rfcs#53.
-
How do we address small ledgers/currencies? interledger/rfcs#132.
-
RFC-8: Should this use JSON-RPC 2? interledger/rfcs#136.
-
RFC-2: propose to migrate to RFCs and IDs repo interledger/rfcs#148.
-
-
12 issues received 22 new comments.
-
PROPOSAL: Map ILP Addresses to existing accounts on existing networks interledger/rfcs#81 (1 comment by @adrianhopebailie)
-
16 pull requests opened.
-
Add RFC 18: Connector Risk Mitigations interledger/rfcs#183, by @emschwartz.
-
Overhaul architecture overview, separate ledger requirements interledger/rfcs#181, by @emschwartz.
-
Update RFCs index interledger/rfcs#178, by @emschwartz.
-
docs(0004,0009): Rename scale to currencyScale, deprecate currencySymbol, deprecate precision interledger/rfcs#177, by @michielbdejong.
-
RFC-3: ILP Packet explanation interledger/rfcs#176, by @mDuo13.
-
ASN.1: ILP Errors and IPR interledger/rfcs#175, by @justmoon.
-
Add errors to Interledger Protocol spec interledger/rfcs#174, by @emschwartz.
-
Clarify that plugin interface is Javascript-specific interledger/rfcs#173, by @emschwartz.
-
Separate PSK from shared secret generation interledger/rfcs#172, by @emschwartz.
-
RFC 11: Change IPR to use ILP Packet and PSK interledger/rfcs#170, by @emschwartz.
-
RFC-9: SPSPv2 (switch to PSK) interledger/rfcs#169, by @emschwartz.
-
ASN.1: Add final ILP Payment Packet format (and drafts of ILQP packets) interledger/rfcs#168, by @justmoon.
-
Docs: add PSK details spec interledger/rfcs#166, by @sharafian.
-
docs(0004,0008) use integer amounts interledger/rfcs#165, by @sentientwaffle.
-
Redirect crypto-conditions to new repo interledger/rfcs#164, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
Update architecture spec & misc updates interledger/rfcs#163, by @justmoon.
-
-
16 pull requests merged.
-
Add errors to Interledger Protocol spec interledger/rfcs#174.
-
Update architecture spec & misc updates interledger/rfcs#163.
-
ASN.1: ILP Errors and IPR interledger/rfcs#175.
-
Update RFCs index interledger/rfcs#178.
-
Clarify that plugin interface is Javascript-specific interledger/rfcs#173.
-
RFC 11: Change IPR to use ILP Packet and PSK interledger/rfcs#170.
-
RFC-9: SPSPv2 (switch to PSK) interledger/rfcs#169.
-
ASN.1: Add final ILP Payment Packet format (and drafts of ILQP packets) interledger/rfcs#168.
-
Separate PSK from shared secret generation interledger/rfcs#172.
-
Docs: add PSK details spec interledger/rfcs#166.
-
docs(0004,0008) use integer amounts interledger/rfcs#165.
-
Differentiate between throwing and rejecting interledger/rfcs#162.
-
Redirect crypto-conditions to new repo interledger/rfcs#164.
-
feat: add RejectionMessage to LedgerPlugin interledger/rfcs#158.
-
fix: fix fulfillment typo interledger/rfcs#161.
-
ILP Addresses (RFC0015) interledger/rfcs#154.
-
-
2 pull requests closed.
-
Specify some normalization rules for URIs interledger/rfcs#147.
-
Fix small typo in 0002-crypto-conditions.md interledger/rfcs#157.
-
-
23 pull requests received 467 new comments.
-
Docs: add PSK details spec interledger/rfcs#166 (143 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @mDuo13, @michielbdejong, @sharafian, @tonychain, @zmanian)
-
Add errors to Interledger Protocol spec interledger/rfcs#174 (53 comments by @earizon, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @mDuo13, @sentientwaffle, @sharafian)
-
Update architecture spec & misc updates interledger/rfcs#163 (48 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @mDuo13, @michielbdejong, @sharafian, @stevenroose)
-
RFC-9: SPSPv2 (switch to PSK) interledger/rfcs#169 (46 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @mDuo13, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
docs(0004,0009): Rename scale to currencyScale, deprecate currencySymbol, deprecate precision interledger/rfcs#177 (38 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @michielbdejong, @sentientwaffle, @sharafian)
-
ASN.1: Add final ILP Payment Packet format (and drafts of ILQP packets) interledger/rfcs#168 (29 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @mDuo13)
-
Add RFC 18: Connector Risk Mitigations interledger/rfcs#183 (23 comments by @dappelt, @emschwartz, @mDuo13, @michielbdejong)
-
RFC 11: Change IPR to use ILP Packet and PSK interledger/rfcs#170 (23 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @mDuo13, @sharafian)
-
Overhaul architecture overview, separate ledger requirements interledger/rfcs#181 (19 comments by @emschwartz, @mDuo13, @professorhantzen, @sappenin)
-
docs(0004,0008) use integer amounts interledger/rfcs#165 (8 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @sappenin, @sentientwaffle)
-
Clarify that plugin interface is Javascript-specific interledger/rfcs#173 (2 comments by @emschwartz, @sharafian)
-
Initial version of a spec providing ILP payments for HTTP calls interledger/rfcs#149 (2 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon)
-
crypto-conditions: Add SECP256K1-SHA-256 fulfillment interledger/rfcs#142 (1 comment by @adrianhopebailie)
-
Participants
-
2 participants joined.
-
Rob Trainer joined.
-
Jimmy Chang joined.
-
-
1 participant left.
-
Rob Trainer left.
-
-
2 organizations left.
-
BitPuch left.
-
Accreditrust, LLC left.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
4 issues opened.
-
idea: timeout-less transactions interledger/rfcs#159, by @michielbdejong.
-
PROPOSAL: Pull payments with TSP and Light Connectors interledger/rfcs#156, by @sharafian.
-
Mention timeout in the route cost function interledger/rfcs#155, by @michielbdejong.
-
Conditions are only SHA-256 interledger/rfcs#153, by @justmoon.
-
-
3 issues closed.
-
RFC-[3,4]: Design error handling behavior interledger/rfcs#42.
-
RFC-3: Formalize the JSON format interledger/rfcs#137.
-
RFC-4: Property `data` on `Transfer` should be `ilpHeader` and `extraHeaders` interledger/rfcs#127.
-
-
1 issue reopened.
-
How do we address small ledgers/currencies? interledger/rfcs#132, by @sharafian.
-
-
12 issues received 60 new comments.
-
RFC9: What is SPSP? interledger/rfcs#152 (16 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @justmoon, @sharafian)
-
Conditions are only SHA-256 interledger/rfcs#153 (9 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon, @mDuo13, @tarcieri, @zookozcash)
-
How do we address small ledgers/currencies? interledger/rfcs#132 (8 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @mDuo13, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
PROPOSAL: Pull payments with TSP and Light Connectors interledger/rfcs#156 (7 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Proposal: we need an Interledger Packet -- not just an ILP Header interledger/rfcs#146 (4 comments by @emschwartz)
-
Proposal: Our transport layers deal with condition generation, memo encryption, ... interledger/rfcs#43 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz)
-
Mention timeout in the route cost function interledger/rfcs#155 (2 comments by @sentientwaffle, @sharafian)
-
RFC-4: Property `data` on `Transfer` should be `ilpHeader` and `extraHeaders` interledger/rfcs#127 (1 comment by @emschwartz)
-
-
6 pull requests opened.
-
Differentiate between throwing and rejecting interledger/rfcs#162, by @michielbdejong.
-
fix: fix fulfillment typo interledger/rfcs#161, by @sentientwaffle.
-
feat: switch to simple conditions interledger/rfcs#160, by @justmoon.
-
feat: add RejectionMessage to LedgerPlugin interledger/rfcs#158, by @sentientwaffle.
-
Fix small typo in 0002-crypto-conditions.md interledger/rfcs#157, by @sbellem.
-
ILP Addresses (RFC0015) interledger/rfcs#154, by @mDuo13.
-
-
1 pull request merged.
-
feat: switch to simple conditions interledger/rfcs#160.
-
-
2 pull requests received 79 new comments.
-
ILP Addresses (RFC0015) interledger/rfcs#154 (77 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @mDuo13, @michielbdejong, @sappenin, @sentientwaffle, @sharafian)
-
Differentiate between throwing and rejecting interledger/rfcs#162 (2 comments by @michielbdejong, @sharafian)
-
Participants
-
1 participant joined.
-
Kyle Kemper joined.
-
-
2 participants left.
-
Edouard COMTET left.
-
Doug Schepers (W3C) left.
-
-
2 organizations joined.
-
OpenJS Foundation joined.
-
Outlier Ventures joined.
-
GitHub
interledger/rfcs
-
6 issues opened.
-
RFC9: What is SPSP? interledger/rfcs#152, by @sharafian.
-
Proposal: Define ILP Errors interledger/rfcs#150, by @emschwartz.
-
RFC-2: propose to migrate to RFCs and IDs repo interledger/rfcs#148, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
Proposal: we need an Interledger Packet -- not just an ILP Header interledger/rfcs#146, by @emschwartz.
-
Documentation clarity - bit string used for subtypes interledger/rfcs#144, by @andrew-g-za.
-
RFC-4: getInfo should be synchronous and populated on connect interledger/rfcs#141, by @justmoon.
-
-
9 issues closed.
-
RFC-4: getInfo should be synchronous and populated on connect interledger/rfcs#141.
-
RFC-2: Replace weighted threshold conditions with regular (unweighted) thresholds interledger/rfcs#87.
-
RFC-2: Encoding of conditions and fulfillments interledger/rfcs#92.
-
RFC-2: Condition maxFulfillmentLength OER encoding interledger/rfcs#105.
-
RFC-2: Fixed-size OER encoding of Condition interledger/rfcs#106.
-
RFC-2: Deduplicate subfulfillments interledger/rfcs#86.
-
Documentation clarity - bit string used for subtypes interledger/rfcs#144.
-
RFC-2: Are PREIMAGE and PREFIX FeatureSuites necessary? interledger/rfcs#115.
-
RFC-2: Typos interledger/rfcs#120.
-
-
14 issues received 43 new comments.
-
How do we address small ledgers/currencies? interledger/rfcs#132 (11 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @sharafian)
-
Proposal: Our transport layers deal with condition generation, memo encryption, ... interledger/rfcs#43 (6 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @sharafian)
-
Proposal: we need an Interledger Packet -- not just an ILP Header interledger/rfcs#146 (6 comments by @emschwartz, @krish7919, @sharafian, @stevenroose)
-
Proposal: Define ILP Errors interledger/rfcs#150 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz, @sharafian)
-
RFC-4: Property `data` on `Transfer` should be `ilpHeader` and `extraHeaders` interledger/rfcs#127 (4 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @emschwartz)
-
RFC-2: Replace weighted threshold conditions with regular (unweighted) thresholds interledger/rfcs#87 (1 comment by @justmoon)
-
RFC 4: Use Common Ledger API Transfer object instead of separate Transfer abstraction interledger/rfcs#139 (1 comment by @adrianhopebailie)
-
PROPOSAL: Recommend that ILP Addresses are only encoded in Base64 interledger/rfcs#59 (1 comment by @justmoon)
-
-
7 pull requests opened.
-
RFC-4: Replace account with from/to interledger/rfcs#151, by @justmoon.
-
Initial version of a spec providing ILP payments for HTTP calls interledger/rfcs#149, by @justmoon.
-
Specify some normalization rules for URIs interledger/rfcs#147, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
FIX: URI format interledger/rfcs#145, by @adrianhopebailie.
-
docs(0004): make plugin.get{Prefix,Account,Info} synchronous interledger/rfcs#143, by @sentientwaffle.
-
crypto-conditions: Add SECP256K1-SHA-256 fulfillment interledger/rfcs#142, by @stevenroose.
-
Earizon seq diagram0004 interledger/rfcs#140, by @earizon.
-
-
6 pull requests merged.
-
RFC-4: Replace account with from/to interledger/rfcs#151.
-
docs(0004): make plugin.get{Prefix,Account,Info} synchronous interledger/rfcs#143.
-
FIX: URI format interledger/rfcs#145.
-
Update 0001-interledger-architecture.md interledger/rfcs#130.
-
Updated draft-02 interledger/rfcs#131.
-
SPSP caching interledger/rfcs#134.
-
-
1 pull request closed.
-
initial draft of ledger API interledger/rfcs#90.
-
-
7 pull requests received 50 new comments.
-
Five Bells Ledger API specification interledger/rfcs#125 (18 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @diminator, @earizon, @justmoon, @mDuo13, @sappenin)
-
crypto-conditions: Add SECP256K1-SHA-256 fulfillment interledger/rfcs#142 (11 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon, @stevenroose)
-
docs(0004): make plugin.get{Prefix,Account,Info} synchronous interledger/rfcs#143 (10 comments by @emschwartz, @justmoon, @sentientwaffle, @sharafian)
-
Updated draft-02 interledger/rfcs#131 (5 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon, @stevenroose, @tonychain)
-
Specify some normalization rules for URIs interledger/rfcs#147 (3 comments by @adrianhopebailie, @justmoon)
-
Initial version of a spec providing ILP payments for HTTP calls interledger/rfcs#149 (1 comment by @justmoon)
-