Semantic Web in Health Care and Life Sciences Community Group - Activity in 2024
No matches.
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
2 issues opened.
-
anyURI values containing pipes are not parseable by the org.hl7.fhir.core library w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#155, by @balhoff.
-
Use Turtle's built-in data typing for literals w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#154, by @dbooth-boston.
-
-
5 issues received 8 new comments.
-
fhir:link missing from MedicationStatement.subject w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#121 (4 comments by @balhoff)
-
anyURI values containing pipes are not parseable by the org.hl7.fhir.core library w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#155 (1 comment by @balhoff)
-
DICOM: What should a DICOM RDF file use as a primary subject? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#142 (1 comment by @detlef-grittner-sohard)
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
1 issue opened.
-
Formatting issues on rdf.html page w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#153, by @dbooth-boston.
-
-
4 issues closed.
-
Current work as it relates to prior DICOM RDF work w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#143.
-
How best to represent DICOM lists with missing elements, in FHIR RDF? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#141.
-
Add clarification to rdf.html page about using OWL w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#128.
-
The hcls-fhir-rdf repository is out of date w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#54.
-
-
8 issues received 10 new comments.
-
Add clarification to rdf.html page about using OWL w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#128 (3 comments by @balhoff, @dbooth-boston)
-
DICOM: How to handle InlineBinary and BulkDataURI? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#144 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
Current work as it relates to prior DICOM RDF work w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#143 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
How best to represent DICOM lists with missing elements, in FHIR RDF? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#141 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
Representation of DICOM "arrays" (values with VM larger than 1) and other values (OB, OW, etc.) in RDF w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#149 (1 comment by @ebremer)
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
1 issue opened.
-
Handling malformed DICOM files w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#152, by @ebremer.
-
-
4 issues closed.
-
duplication of some root RDF properties w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#114.
-
missing datatype for FHIR primitive types w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#117.
-
missing Narrative.div w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#115.
-
Handling malformed DICOM files w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#152.
-
-
13 issues received 18 new comments.
-
fhir:link missing from MedicationStatement.subject w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#121 (4 comments by @balhoff, @dbooth-boston, @tmprd)
-
align Reference with canonical (and gen fhir:link for every fhir:uri value; fhir:link --> fhir:l) w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#120 (2 comments by @balhoff, @dbooth-boston)
-
missing datatype for FHIR primitive types w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#117 (2 comments by @balhoff, @dbooth-boston)
-
Minor fixes needed for the results of terminology.hl7.org merges w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#132 (1 comment by @gaurav)
-
HAPI says it is serving R5 FHIR RDF, but it's actually giving R4 FHIR RDF w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#137 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
DICOM: Creation of https://w3id.org/dcm namespace w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#151 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
2 issues opened.
-
DICOM: Creation of https://w3id.org/dcm namespace w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#151, by @ebremer.
-
Remove extra comment characters w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#150, by @tmprd.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
DICOM RDF Serialization Proposals w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#147.
-
-
7 issues received 8 new comments.
-
Minor fixes needed for the results of terminology.hl7.org merges w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#132 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
DICOM: What should a DICOM RDF file use as a primary subject? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#142 (1 comment by @ebremer)
-
Representation of DICOM "arrays" (values with VM larger than 1) and other values (OB, OW, etc.) in RDF w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#149 (1 comment by @ebremer)
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
1 issue opened.
-
8 issues received 10 new comments.
-
DICOM: What should a DICOM RDF file use as a primary subject? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#142 (3 comments by @detlef-grittner-sohard, @ebremer)
-
DICOM Amalgam v1.0 -- Overall DICOM RDF serialization plan w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#148 (1 comment by @ebremer)
-
Representation of DICOM "arrays" (values with VM larger than 1) and other values (OB, OW, etc.) in RDF w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#149 (1 comment by @ebremer)
-
DICOM Private Data Elements in DICOM RDF w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#145 (1 comment by @detlef-grittner-sohard)
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
7 issues opened.
-
DICOM Amalgam v1.0 -- Overall DICOM RDF serialization plan w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#148, by @ebremer.
-
DICOM RDF Serialization Proposals w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#147, by @ericprud.
-
DICOM Sequence Tags (SQ) handling w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#146, by @ebremer.
-
DICOM Private Data Elements in DICOM RDF w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#145, by @detlef-grittner-sohard.
-
DICOM: How to handle InlineBinary and BulkDataURI? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#144, by @ebremer.
-
Current work as it relates to prior DICOM RDF work w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#143, by @ebremer.
-
DICOM: What should a DICOM RDF file use as a primary subject? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#142, by @ebremer.
-
-
2 issues received 2 new comments.
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
2 issues received 7 new comments.
-
How best to represent DICOM lists with missing elements, in FHIR RDF? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#141 (6 comments by @dbooth-boston, @ebremer, @ericprud, @gaurav)
-
Find additional IRI prefixes to add to terminology.hl7.org w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#123 (1 comment by @gaurav)
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
9 issues received 19 new comments.
-
How best to represent DICOM lists with missing elements, in FHIR RDF? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#141 (8 comments by @dbooth-boston, @ebremer, @JervenBolleman)
-
Add FHIR RDF validation capability to Playground w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#130 (3 comments by @csisc, @dbooth-boston)
-
missing type assertion for [x] property w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#122 (2 comments by @dbooth-boston, @tmprd)
-
fhir:link missing from MedicationStatement.subject w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#121 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
1 issue opened.
-
How best to represent DICOM lists with missing elements, in FHIR RDF? w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#141, by @dbooth-boston.
-
-
4 issues closed.
-
Add "What's New in FHIR RDF" to FAQ managed by FHIR-I group w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#124.
-
HAPI parser/generator updates for R5 w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#125.
-
Update the SPARQL scripts to add the OWL ontology declarations w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#126.
-
w5 ontology version IRI is stored as a string w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#131.
-
-
5 issues received 5 new comments.
-
Add "What's New in FHIR RDF" to FAQ managed by FHIR-I group w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#124 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
Update the SPARQL scripts to add the OWL ontology declarations w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#126 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
Minor fixes needed for the results of terminology.hl7.org merges w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#132 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
HAPI says it is serving R5 FHIR RDF, but it's actually giving R4 FHIR RDF w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#137 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
-
1 pull request received 1 new comment.
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
2 issues closed.
-
Figure out a way to handle CURIES alongside IRI stems w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#127.
-
Update Unit Tests for RDF generation w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#136.
-
-
8 issues received 13 new comments.
-
Find additional IRI prefixes to add to terminology.hl7.org w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#123 (2 comments by @gaurav)
-
Figure out a way to handle CURIES alongside IRI stems w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#127 (2 comments by @dbooth-boston, @gaurav)
-
Minor fixes needed for the results of terminology.hl7.org merges w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#132 (2 comments by @dbooth-boston, @gaurav)
-
Update Unit Tests for RDF generation w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#136 (2 comments by @dbooth-boston, @tmprd)
-
Add FHIR RDF validation capability to Playground w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#130 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
w5 ontology version IRI is stored as a string w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#131 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
HAPI says it is serving R5 FHIR RDF, but it's actually giving R4 FHIR RDF w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#137 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
1 pull request received 2 new comments.
-
Update documentation about RDF generation w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#135 (2 comments by @dbooth-boston, @tmprd)
-
GitHub
w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf
-
2 issues opened.
-
Update rdf.html to say we encourage non-prefixed terminology codes w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#140, by @dbooth-boston.
-
gforge.hl7.org links fail with certificate issues w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#139, by @jscheidtmann.
-
-
1 issue closed.
-
gforge.hl7.org links fail with certificate issues w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#139.
-
-
2 issues reopened.
-
How do we discriminate polymorphic types w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#138, by @dbooth-boston.
-
align Reference with canonical (and gen fhir:link for every fhir:uri value; fhir:link --> fhir:l) w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#120, by @dbooth-boston.
-
-
3 issues received 5 new comments.
-
align Reference with canonical (and gen fhir:link for every fhir:uri value; fhir:link --> fhir:l) w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#120 (2 comments by @dbooth-boston)
-
gforge.hl7.org links fail with certificate issues w3c-cg/hcls-fhir-rdf#139 (1 comment by @dbooth-boston)
-